>>22454143, >>22454157, >>22454187, >>22454202, >>22454517, >>22454570, >>22454685 Karoline Leavitt KABOOOOOOOMS!!!PN

What Trump and Team are doing is reforming the entire government into the younger generations. No longer the Mitch McConnels and Schumer corrupt generations to continue to the Not America First generations that have held power for 4-5 decades. It's obvious during his winning this election, he prefers the America First Generations to take over government. We will no longer have the Mafia generations to rule the country. America First is America first not last, into unnecessary wars for their own benefit.

Barron inspired him how to return our country to true patriots.

This is an exciting time to be alive to see the shift.

Almost all our founding fathers were in their late 20's, 30's and early 40's. Benjamin Franklin was the oldest at that time.

Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders announces Medicaid work requirement plan

Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders on Tuesday announced that Arkansas has requested a waiver that would allow the state to add a work requirement to its Medicaid expansion program known as Arkansas Health and Opportunity for Me, or ARHOME.

“The requirement is simple,” Sanders said during a news conference in the governor’s conference room. “If you want to receive free health care paid for by your fellow taxpayer, able bodied and working age adults have to work, go to school, volunteer or be home to take care of their kids.”

The “Pathway to Prosperity” amendment would have to be approved by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid services. There will be a 30 day public comment period on the amendment before it is submitted to CMS for approval

Yes Finally

11:15

https://youtu.be/9caOsv2Rf0c

It's up to 7+ percent when the left wing does the polls, it much higher of course

Once again, Trump starts a term with a weak approval rating

Most modern presidents were more popular at the start of their terms.

G. Elliott Morris

ByG. Elliott Morris

January 28, 2025, 11:09 AM ET

• 5 min read

What Americans think about Trump's plans | 538 Politics PodcastWhat do Americans want from Trump’s second term? The crew delves into this question, exploring thermostatic public opinion and Trump’s strategy of testing the waters on key issues.Mark Schiefelbein/AP Photo, Adobe

Today, 538 is unveiling a new polling average for President Donald Trump's job approval rating. Based on the 11 polls released since his inauguration on Jan. 20, Trump's average approval rating starts off at 50 percent, while 43 percent disapprove of the job he is doing as president. You can find a constantly updated estimate of Trump's approval rating on 538's polls page, and you can read our full methodology for calculating this average here.

Trump's initial net approval rating of +7 percentage points is lower than that of any newly elected president since World War II, with one exception: Trump himself during his first term. Trump began his presidency in 2017 with a 44.6 percent approval rating and a 41.4 percent disapproval rating, based on applying our current averaging methodology retroactively. Before that, the record low for initial net approval rating was set by former President George W. Bush in 2001, at +28 points. However, former President Joe Biden started his first term at +22 in 2021….

Ok assholes you will have to tell the truth sometime soon.

https://abcnews.go.com/amp/538/story?id=118146633

Tillis just hung himself

Exclusive | Tillis Assured Hegseth’s Former Sister-in-Law Her testimony Could Convince GOP Vote No==

Jan. 27, 2025 6:08 pm

Sen. Thom Tillis (R., N. C.)

WASHINGTON—A key witness in the contentious Senate confirmation of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth was assured by Sen. Thom Tillis (R., N.C.) that her sworn statement would carry weight in last week’s vote and could convince Republican senators to oppose the nominee, according to people familiar with the events.

Tillis personally assured Danielle Hegseth in a call on Jan. 19, witnessed by two other people, that if she signed the statement testifying that she believed her former brother-in-law Pete Hegseth has an alcohol abuse problem and was abusive to his second wife, it would carry weight, and potentially move three votes—his own, along with the votes of Sens. Susan Collins (R., Maine) and Lisa Murkowski (R., Alaska), those people said.

On Friday, Tillis became the 50th senator to vote “yes” on Hegseth, clinching his confirmation to lead the Pentagon.

In a statement, Tillis didn’t dispute The Wall Street Journal’s reporting about the call. He said Danielle Hegseth’s statement “did carry weight, which is why I communicated my concerns to the White House and spent days doing my due diligence and seeing if there were any firsthand corroborating accounts of the sworn statement.” He continued that he was “not able to speak with anyone who provided firsthand corroboration.”

Tillis said he did extensive research including long conversations with Hegseth and his vote “makes it clear where the facts ultimately led,” and that he looks forward to working with the new Defense secretary.

In her sworn statement, released last Tuesday, Danielle Hegseth said she had decided to come forward publicly, “at significant personal sacrifice” because she was very concerned about Hegseth leading the U.S. military and “because I have been assured that making this public statement will ensure that certain senators who are still on the fence will vote against Hegseth’s confirmation. But for that assurance I would not subject myself or others referred to in this statement to the public scrutiny this statement is likely to cause.”

Republicans, who have a 53-47 majority in the Senate, can only afford to lose three votes on any nominee, assuming all Democrats are opposed.

On Thursday, Collins and Murkowski both publicly announced they would vote no. Collins’s reasoning didn’t cite the sworn statement as a reason for her vote. Instead she listed Hegseth’s lack of managerial experience, his past comments opposing women in combat, and said he didn’t really understand the policies the Pentagon is required to follow, including the Geneva Conventions prohibiting torture. Murkowski pointed to concerns about his character, and allegations of financial mismanagement of veterans organizations he led, as well as his statements on women in combat. She said Hegseth wasn’t “prepared for such immense responsibility.”

The next night, all members of the Democratic caucus voted no. Collins and Murkowski both voted no, as did Sen. Mitch McConnell (R., Ky.). Tillis then voted “yes” on Hegseth.

Vice President JD Vance, in his role as president of the Senate, broke the 50-50 tie, confirming Hegseth by 51-50.

After voting, Tillis sat on a wooden desk on the Republican side of the chamber, and spoke intently with Collins and Murkowski, who were seated together in front of him, for several minutes. Collins sat with her arms crossed, listening. Murkowski spoke to Tillis, gesturing emphatically with her hands. When Vance, from the dais, formally announced the results of the vote, most Republican senators applauded. But Collins, Murkowski and Tillis didn’t.

Several Republicans had expressed doubts about Hegseth after Trump picked him last year. But the tide turned in his favor after meetings with GOP senators, boosted by a pressure campaign from Trump allies who threatened a primary challenge to Sen. Joni Ernst (R., Iowa) unless she got on board. Tillis is up for re-election next year, raising the stakes for him.

During his confirmation hearing earlier this month, Hegseth said he wasn’t perfect but dismissed questions about his character and qualifications as an anonymous smear campaign.

In a statement issued immediately after the vote Friday night, Danielle Hegseth said that she was promised a week earlier that her statement, on the record, would corroborate other accusations and make a difference in key votes. She didn’t say who promised her this. “But in the end, it did not,” she said. “What happened today will make women who have experienced abuse and mistreatment even less forthcoming.”

Danielle Hegseth’s sworn statement, made under penalty of perjury, accused Pete Hegseth of alcohol abuse and erratic behavior, and said his ex-wife, Samantha Hegseth, …

https://archive.is/rmUCu

He just fucked himself so bad, its not even funny!

Google reclassifies U.S. as ‘sensitive country’ alongside China, Russia after Trump’s ‘Gulf of America’ TUE, JAN 28 2025

Jennifer Elias

KEY POINTS

• Google’s maps division on Monday reclassified the U.S. as a “sensitive country,” a designation it reserves for states with strict governments and border disputes, CNBC has learned.

•The decision to elevate the U.S. to its list of sensitive countries illustrates the challenges Tech companies face in navigating the Trump presidency.

• Google’s list of “sensitive” countries includes China, Russia, Israel, Saudi Arabia and Iraq.

(So the Google donations will be kept and they will be seriously fucked for the next 4 years. Good job assholes)

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/01/28/google-reclassifies-us-as-sensitive-country-like-china-russia-.html

Judge Cannon Body Slams Biden DOJ’s Last-Ditch Lawfare Effort

(Much love for Margot, brilliant!)

BY: MARGOT CLEVELAND JANUARY 27, 2025.1/2

A federal court on Tuesday condemned the Department of Justice’s efforts to provide members of Congress Volume II of the Special Counsel report while criminal prosecutions related to the report remained ongoing. While the country has moved on from the issue following Donald Trump’s inauguration, last week’s order crystalizes the Biden Administration’s outrageous weaponization of the DOJ against not just Trump but those associated with him.

Two weeks before Trump’s inauguration, the DOJ announced its intent to publicly release Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report on his investigations into Trump’s challenges to 2020 election and Trump’s retention of supposedly classified documents. Waltine Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira, both of whom had been charged by Smith as co-defendants with Trump in the classified documents case, responded by filing an emergency motion to prevent the release of the report.

Trump and his two co-defendants had previously moved for the dismissal of the indictment, arguing that Smith had been improperly appointed and thus lacked authority to prosecute the criminal case. The presiding judge, Trump-appointee Aileen Cannon, agreed, and dismissed the case. The Biden Administration appealed to the Eleventh Circuit.

Following Trump’s election, the DOJ dismissed the appeal as to Trump, while continuing to challenge the dismissal of the criminal charges against Nauta and De Oliveira. And thus, the two co-defendants remain in criminal jeopardy.

Nonetheless, the DOJ announced its plans to release the special counsel report which detailed its investigation into Nauta and De Oliveira. Attorney General Merrick Garland would later walk back the release, announcing that his department would only publicly release Volume I of the report — which concerned the 2020 election — and for Volume II, it would limit access to that report to the majority and ranking members of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees.

Nauta, De Oliveira, Trump, and Jeff Clark, the latter of whom remains under indictment in Fulton County, Georgia on supposed conspiracy charges related to the 2020 election, objected to the release of Volume I. Judge Cannon, however, concluded she lacked the authority to bar the release of that portion of the special counsel report because she was only presiding over the classified documents case. The DOJ promptly pounced, releasing Volume I of the report to the public within minutes of obtaining the green light to do so.

Conversely, Judge Cannon stayed release of Volume II pending a hearing on the issue. Following that hearing and after taking the matter under advisement, on Tuesday, the Court entered an order prohibiting the DOJ from releasing or sharing any information from Volume II outside the Justice Department.

Judge Cannon’s order not only ruled against the DOJ but eviscerated the department for its litigation strategy.

“A court has an affirmative duty, triggered at the inception of a criminal proceeding, to safeguard the due process rights of the accused,” Judge Cannon wrote, before stressing:

“Never before has the Department of Justice, prior to the conclusion of criminal proceedings against a defendant — and absent a litigation-specific reason as appropriate in the case itself — sought to disclose outside the Department a report prepared by a Special Counsel containing substantive and voluminous case information. Until now.”

Here, after noting “the statements” proffered by the government to justify providing Volume II to the leaders of the judiciary committees “do not reflect well on the Department,”=Judge Cannon decimated the DOJ’s argument that “disclosure to four members of Congress is necessary right now— before the conclusion of criminal proceedings — because Attorney General Garland has ‘limited time’ left in his tenure as the head of the Department and wishes ‘to comply with the historical practice of all Special Counsel.’”

HTTPS://THEFEDERALIST.COM/2025/01/27/JUDGE-CANNON-BODY-SLAMS-BIDEN-DOJS-LAST-DITCH-LAWFARE-EFFORT/

>>22457258

2/2

However, “[t]here is no ‘historical practice’ of providing Special Counsel reports to Congress, even on a limited basis, pending conclusion of criminal proceedings,” Judge Cannon stressed. “In fact, there is not one instance of this happening until now.” The federal judge then chastised the DOJ for “misleadingly” referencing Special Counsel David Weiss’s Congressional 2023 testimony as an example of “historical practice.” First, the DOJ opposed Congress’s request for Special Counsel Weiss to testify, Judge Cannon noted. And second, when Weiss eventually agreed to testify “on limited matters,” he “repeatedly refusing to answer questions regarding ongoing litigation in order to prevent prejudice to ‘the rights of defendants or other individuals involved in these matters.’”

Judge Cannon also destroyed the DOJ’s argument that there was “legislative interest in information about Special Counsel investigations, in order to consider possible legislative reforms regarding the use of special counsels.” “[T]here has been no subpoena from Congress to the Department for Volume II,” Judge Cannon stressed. Nor is there any “indication of pending legislative activity that could be aided by the proposed disclosure of Volume II to the specified members of Congress,” she added.

“In short,” Judge Cannon concluded, “the Department offers no valid justification for the purportedly urgent desire to release to members of Congress case information in an ongoing criminal proceeding.” She went further, however, questioning why the DOJ would even attempt to release of Volume II when “its own Justice Manual, which expressly directs against disclosing substantive case information in a criminal case ‘except as appropriate in the proceeding or in an announcement after a finding of guilt.’” Here, Judge Cannon, citing the American Bar Association’s rules of professional conduct, stressed that “[a] prosecutor has the responsibility of a minister of justice and not simply that of an advocate . . . .”

The Court was also not convinced by the DOJ’s claim that limited disclosure to select members of Congress would protect against any potential prejudice to the Defendants because the congressmen would agree to keep the report confidential. But given constitutional immunity, the ranking members of the Judiciary Committees could disclose the details of the report on the House or Senate floor without consequence. Given this fact, and the strong interest in the special counsel’s report, Judge Cannon concluded there was “certainly a reasonable likelihood that review by members of Congress as proposed will result in public dissemination of all or part of Volume II.”

“That reasonable likelihood risks substantial prejudice to the due process rights of Defendants,” Judge Cannon concluded, noting that “[t]he bare wishes of one Attorney General with ‘limited time’ in office to comply with a non-existent ‘historical practice’ of releasing Special Counsel reports in the pendency of criminal proceedings,” did “not override the obvious constitutional interests of Defendants in this action . . . ”

The order continued then where it began, highlighting the special role prosecutors play in our criminal justice system and stressing that they are “entrusted and expected to do justice.” The DOJ’s efforts to provide Volume II to the majority and ranking members of the Judiciary committees “has not been faithful to that obligation,” Judge Cannon concluded.

What Judge Cannon left unsaid— but what follows directly from her analysis — is that the DOJ’s public release of Volume I of the special counsel report substantially prejudiced the due process rights of the individuals implicated in that report.

While Judge Cannon concluded she lacked the authority to prohibit the release of Volume I, the immediate release of that portion of the special counsel report in disregard to the due process rights of third parties should render Attorney General Merrick Garland a pariah in legal circles. He was entrusted and expected to do justice —but for the sake of getting Trump he abandoned those precepts.

HTTPS://THEFEDERALIST.COM/2025/01/27/JUDGE-CANNON-BODY-SLAMS-BIDEN-DOJS-LAST-DITCH-LAWFARE-EFFORT/

>>22457270

Judge Cannon needs 24 hour protection, since she took on this case, and challenged so a corrupt and hog tied AG of the Justice Depr

She went above and beyond to the threats of her own person to defend and protect the remaining two being railroaded by Garland all because of his desire to break the law for his absent boss.

Garland destroyed any ounce of justice in his many acts of injustice.

what a freakin coward

>>22457395

Cannon should replace KBJ, the person (not woman), that has proven she is a worse choice than the other two retards, maybe 3, with Coney Barrett

Citizen Free Press

@CitizenFreePres

WORD TO JAKE TAPPER – DON'T EVER PISS OFF STEPHEN MILLER.

1) This is a beautiful rationale for mass deportations.

2) Wait for the ending, it gets better.

Western Lensman

11:33 PM · Jan 28, 2025

·7,071 Views

https://x.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1884459807500796386

I don't get why Tapper thinks he can outsmart Miller

>>22457462

Tapper is an idiot compared to Obi One Miller. His entire head is filled with provable facts and truth. Golly Tapper probably thought "I got him now".Kekkity