She's projecting her own experience and classifying anything outside of it as misinformation. Wish he would just say the truth on it. Some people have no terrible reactions but that does not discount those that have or the possibility of those in the future having bad reactions. My own experience is that they're dangerous. My time on them (originally put on for panic attacks, nothing more) was spent as a different person. Impulsive, verbally abusive, apathetic and more aggressive. Took it upon myself to get off after a decade and it was the worst experience but I'm free of them though stunned at the memory of what I was while on them. In the right person and mind they're incredibly dangerous.. we all know that here. So it's irresponsible for her to classify my testimony as misinformation because she benefited without issue.. and it's not alright to market a product that can have this possible and likely reaction in anyone.
Been there anon.. multiple times before I knew better.. worst experience of my life but free now and would never go back.