So what is the direction you think?
Have you made it clear here?
Very easy to say.
Does that include fake news?
Is that as an individual?
Or is it this movement?
Or a group formed in response to this movement?
Did me write it like the CNN question?
I don't think I was asked this question when I was interviewed.
Censorship and information being hidden is a common practice.
If you understand that censorship and speech control exist, you will naturally change the way you proof information.
If QAnon becomes Anon and Baker, that would be constructive.
I agree.
So I think individual proofs are constructive.
To make it easier to compare and contrast.
That's a possibility too, right?
Then I think you should make a catalog or ask BO here to make a catalog where you can keep the results of your personal research.
Maybe they'll tell you to do it on /comms/.
Like clock fag thread for example.
Good for you.
You got your own catalog, right?
Or if you don't want that catalog, why don't you throw it away and make a new one?
Now what's the problem?