Anonymous ID: 2fb35e Jan. 31, 2025, 7:06 a.m. No.22475905   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5945

>>22475885

>Whoever put through gtranny in the cockpit is toast

Oh goody, is this the part of the Movie, where the CLOWNS get exposed for their FAKE NEWS?

 

Because, UNTIL there is TOTAL TRANSPARENCY in their FUCKERY, it will just be another day @ war

Anonymous ID: 2fb35e Jan. 31, 2025, 7:36 a.m. No.22476092   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>22476063

>Do air traffic controllers have qualified immunity?

 

This question goes back to the Federal Tort Claims Act. The Federal Tort Claims Act permits private parties to sue the US in a federal court for harm committed by persons acting on behalf of the United States. There is a limitation known as the Discretionary function exception. The discretionary function exception restores the government’s immunity in situations where its employees are carrying out governmental or ‘regulatory’ duties. Under this rule it could mean that as long as air traffic controllers were carrying out what they believe to be their best judgment they may not be found at fault. While this may sound applicable, courts have ruled that an air traffic control error never falls within the Discretionary Function Exception.

 

Yes- air traffic controllers can be found at fault and not covered under the discretionary function rule.

 

In the United States, an air traffic controller can be held liable. However, the United States will pay any damages associated with the lawsuit unless the controllers actions were intentional. The victim may sue under the FTCA for the controllers’ negligence. From there the case would go to federal court, similar to the way it would as if one were suing an individual under the same circumstances.

 

There are other rules that will apply that will make the lawsuit process different, including certain forms that must be filled out, the damages that may be awarded, and who judges the case. These and other variations are ones that the victim will want to be well aware of before the process begins.

 

Curry, Pearson & Wooten, is uniquely positioned to handle these cases as Michael Pearson is a former air traffic controller with almost 27 years of FAA experience. In addition, he litigates cases in federal court on a regular basis. We handle cases worldwide. Call us for further information.

 

https://www.azlaw.com/aviation-accident/air-traffic-control-and-the-discretionary-function/

Anonymous ID: 2fb35e Jan. 31, 2025, 7:41 a.m. No.22476123   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>22476114

> far better than the utter shit they have been airing for the last 20 years.

Truth.

Removed wholesome shows for shit like 16 & pregnant or Keeping up with the KarTRASHians

Anonymous ID: 2fb35e Jan. 31, 2025, 8:16 a.m. No.22476319   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6414

>>22476304

As long as Gaslighting is allowed from Head Congressional Fuckwits, and NONE of the alleged Patriots around there has filed to have these swamp creatures EXPELLED, then ALL OF THEM ARE TRAITORS at this point.

 

TRUST IS EARNED.

Anonymous ID: 2fb35e Jan. 31, 2025, 8:56 a.m. No.22476546   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6599

>>22476521

IDK, perhaps some anons with X accounts need to go repost SNOWDEN TRAITOR DROPS.

 

He was PAID by the Pickle Factory to divert attention towards the NSA. Once a pickle, always a pickle.

 

Tired of the non TRUTH shit, and sheep following idiots. THOSE YOU TRUST THE MOST!

FknMassie

Anonymous ID: 2fb35e Jan. 31, 2025, 9:09 a.m. No.22476637   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6658 >>6717

>>22476599

I agree with the fact that TRANSPARENCY is paramount.

The Gatekeepers have caused a lot of issues, with people waking up.

However, the CIA is the Deepstate, with their very own, more sisnster tracking operations than the NSA.

 

What is moar important, showing that Silicon Valley clowns house the servers that the CIA created? But tried to divert from by using SNOWDEN?

Fakebook real intention = CIA tracking, internet not needed?

Google

DARPA

 

Lets focus on the root, not the pimple.