Free speech for real in USA should be on every Americans lips.
All white people should be racist.
All people are racist in their own people groups.
White people are the only group who cannot be a proud group publicly.
Kanye is telling real truth.
>>22547755
>>22547755
>>22547762
>>22547776
>>22547786
The Slants
SCOTUS CASE
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/16pdf/15-1293_1o13.pdf
The Slants Win Supreme Court Battle Over Band's Name In Trademark Dispute
JUNE 19, 2017
https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/06/19/533514196/the-slants-win-supreme-court-battle-over-bands-name-in-trademark-dispute
https://www.akerman.com/en/perspectives/supreme-court-disparaging-speech-protected-by-first-amendment-lanham-act-slants-skins.html
USA Today
https://www.usatoday.com
A resounding victory for free speech
Supreme Court delivers a victory for free speech on The Slants trademark case
Jun 19, 2017 — … disgusting, violent videos or distasteful protests at military funerals. … But Monday's decision in The Slants case is what freedom sounds like.
The beauty of the government our Founders created is that people who find The Slants — or any other name — offensive have plenty of options to express their disgust. They could go to a Slants concert and protest. Or launch a boycott. The antidote to speech you find offensive is more speech, not getting the government to ban it.
Akerman LLP
https://www.akerman.com
Supreme Court: Disparaging Speech Protected By First Amendment; Lanham Act Section 2(a) Unconstitutional: A Win for the Slants and the Skins
Jun 20, 2017 — The Court held that the Lanham Act's prohibition on registering federal trademarks that “disparage” any person violates the First Amendment.
In the United States, there is no legal definition for "hate speech". This is because the First Amendment protects the freedom of speech, which includes the right to express hateful views.
Explanation
The First Amendment protects the right to say hateful things without censorship.
The Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that the government cannot punish or prohibit hate speech.
The First Amendment protects the freedom of thought, even if it's hateful.
The government can't discriminate against speech based on the speaker's viewpoint.
Hate speech is protected because it's part of the democratic dialogue.
However, hate speech can be considered a violation of other laws if it's a true threat, incitement to violence, or discriminatory harassment.
The Washington Post
https://www.washingtonpost.com
Supreme Court unanimously reaffirms: There is no 'hate speech' exception to the First Amendment
Jun 19, 2017 — Speech that demeans on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender, religion, age, disability, or any other similar ground is hateful; but the proudest …
Supreme Court Affirms Hate Speech Protected
Published: June 21, 2017.
Supreme Court unanimously reaffirms: There is no 'hate speech' exception to the First Amendment
Jun 19, 2017 — Speech that demeans
First Amendment expert, Eugene Volokh writes that in Matal v. Tam, also known as the “Slants” case, the “justices made clear that speech that some view as racially offensive is protected not just against outright prohibition but also against lesser restrictions.” For example, Justice Samuel Alito wrote that silencing offensive speech is wrong and that “our free speech jurisprudence is that we protect the freedom to express ‘the thought that we hate’.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matal_v._Tam
The Washington Post
https://www.washingtonpost.com
Supreme Court unanimously reaffirms: There is no 'hate speech' exception to the First Amendment
Jun 19, 2017 — Speech that demeans on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender, religion, age, disability, or any other similar ground is hateful; but the proudest …