Federal judge blocks Trump order on health care for transgender youth
The lawsuit filed by families and LGBTQ advocates challenges an order that aims to end federal support for gender transition care for people under 19.
February 13, 2025 at 3:30 p.m. EST14 minutes ago
A federal judge on Thursday blocked executive orders signed by President Donald Trump that target transgender people and their health care, giving temporary relief to LGBTQ individuals and their families, who braced for legal battles to continue.
U.S. District Judge Brendan A. Hursongranted a temporary restraining order after a hearing in federal court in Baltimore. The government is expected to appeal the decision, which legal experts said could ultimately go to the Supreme Court.
“This is a population with an extremely higher rate for suicide, poverty, unemployment, drug addiction,” Hurson said during the hearing. Abruptly stopping their health treatments, he said, would be “horribly dangerous for anyone, for any care, but particularly for this extremely vulnerable population.”
Transgender minors and advocacy groups sought an injunction to roll back orders Trump signed to officially recognize only male and female sexes and to attempt to end federal support for providers of gender transition care for people under the age of 19.
The latter order prompted some hospitals to suspend or scale back gender transition care, leaving patients and parents reeling. Trump’s orders are part of a broader effort by the administration to bar transgender people from everyday life, including sports and military service.
Seven anonymous transgender individuals younger than 19 sued the Trump administrationon Feb. 4, along with advocacy groups PFLAG, which represents parents, families and friends of LGBTQ+ people, and GLMA, which supports LGBTQ+ health-care providers. Lambda Legal and the ACLU filed the lawsuit on behalf of the groups in federal court in Baltimore.
In a separate lawsuit, attorneys general in Washington state, Oregon and Minnesota argue the Trump order on gender-affirming care represents an attack on transgender youths and their families, as well as on doctors and medical institutions providing critical care. A hearing on that case is set for Friday in Seattle.
In a court filing, the Justice Department argued that the president has legal authority “to condition certain federal grant funding on his policy preferences” and that the federal agencies being sued “have not finally implemented the [executive order] directives, let alone revoked any particular grants relied upon” by the plaintiffs. It also argued that “many states and other countries have gone further and enacted laws and policies to restrict gender-affirming care for minors.”
The gender transition care order seeks to cut federal funding,including public insurance payments from Medicare and Medicaid, for health providers that offer such care to people under 19. A loss of federal dollars could jeopardize care for not just transgender young people, LGBTQ+ advocates say. (so our money is paying for this destruction)
Within days of the order, hospitals in the D.C. region and beyond paused care. Some halted all treatment, while others blocked prescriptions of puberty blockers and hormone therapy or gender-affirming surgeries. The moves drew protests, including a rally in Baltimore ahead of Thursday’s court hearing.
Kristen Chapman, one of the plaintiffs in the suit filed by families, moved with her daughter to Virginia in July 2023 to access care banned in their home state of Tennessee. The day after Trump’s order denying care to transgender young people, her 17-year-old daughter’s appointment at Children’s Hospital of Richmond was canceled, the mother has said.
In the past five years, more than half of states have already banned doctors from offering transition health care to minors, including medication. Yet most transgender children do not take medication to assist with their transition
https://archive.is/t355g#selection-557.0-590.0
(There is going to be massive impeachments of federal, state, circuit and state judges this year. They are just exposing themselves0