Anonymous ID: 2f480b Jan. 31, 2018, 1:44 p.m. No.226342   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>226296

Thanks for your graphic and your work, anon.

 

The top part tells the entire story. See screen cap.

 

1st tweet @0850 - 1150 EST - A half hour after the train wreck

 

{Deleted Tweet with nasty train joke} ← Come back and reconcile after looking at the surrounding tweets.

 

2nd tweet @0916 - 1216 EST

 

Time for the timezone-incompetent to lay this to rest.

Anonymous ID: 2f480b Jan. 31, 2018, 1:51 p.m. No.226426   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6447

>>226404

Well, dayum! There it is! I'll confirm once I've got the document downloaded.

>docs.house.gov/meetings/IG/IG00/20180129/106822/HMTG-115-IG00-Transcript-20180129.pdf

 

If so, this is a WHOPPER of a find!

Anonymous ID: 2f480b Jan. 31, 2018, 1:56 p.m. No.226465   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6494

>>226443

>>226450

>>226447

Relevant Q posts:

>>>/greatawakening/47

Q !UW.yye1fxo Sun 21 Jan 2018 14:06:20 No.47

Will SESSIONS drop the hammer?

1 of 22.

#Memo shifts narrative.

#Memo reinstates SESSIONS' authority re: Russia/ALL.

#Memo factually demonstrates collusion at highest levels.

#Memo factually demonstrates HUSSEIN ADMIN weaponized INTEL community to ensure D victory [+insurance].

#Memo factually demonstrates 'knowingly false intel' provided to FISA Judges to obtain warrant(s).

<snip>

 

>>130638

Q !UW.yye1fxo Mon 22 Jan 2018 21:47:32 b189f8 No.130638

What would happen if texts originating from a FBI agent to several [internals] discussed the assassination (possibility) of the POTUS or member of his family?

What if the texts suggest foreign allies were involved?

Forget the Russia set up [1 of 22].

This is only the beginning.

Be careful what you wish for.

<snip>

 

<I didn't include the full posts>

Anonymous ID: 2f480b Jan. 31, 2018, 2:06 p.m. No.226573   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Looking at you, Baker

 

This may fill up faster than normal with the 1 of 22 going on. Godspeed, Patriot!

Anonymous ID: 2f480b Jan. 31, 2018, 2:16 p.m. No.226653   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6662

So, Q team spoke of 1 of 22 on 21 and 22 JAN. This document we're looking at is from 29 JAN. Are we looking at the wrong document?

 

SERIOUS question.

 

Does the document not matter; just the names?