TY BAKER.
Going to lock pb and clean the currently 751 bread.
-
BV
@40
hello cia shill active atm
>Alberta Family Doctor warns that the Childhood Schedule is going to be quietly switched to MRNA technology
Doesn't seem all that quiet, anons have been hearing about this for a long time
What do parents know at this point?
sauce please
if you don't care enough to provide it, don't post it
Plz avoid SAUCELESS TWATS/ARTICLES - call them out if you see them >>22573863
Good idea.
but for those who've already refreshed, what's been deleted is
Vati spammer
Dear Cia spammer
Gould spammer
some post on about bloody baby penises
>sauce
not a fetish
normal diggers know to post sauce AND anons know how to call out sauceless posts
but now we got a sudden upsurge by a handful of posters.
If asked for sauce, they either ignore or say FO.
Looks more like an OP than an innocent mistake.
searching for sauce, found the Turley report right away
did not locate the Flynn post
looking more closely, it's a year old - no wonder
easy to miss
juxtaposition makes it look like Flynn is responding to the Turley/Bruce QR.
no.
WHY SAUCE MATTERS.
The Eyes Have It: U.S. Intelligence Allegedly Asked Foreign Countries to Surveil Trump Associates
https://jonathanturley.org/2024/02/15/the-eyes-have-it-u-s-intelligence-allegedly-asked-foreign-countries-to-surveil-trump-associates/
There is a disturbing report published on Michael Shellenberger’s Public Substack detailing how the U.S. intelligence community called upon foreign governments to target associates of Donald Trump before the 2016 election. The request to the “Five Eyes” agencies (the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and New Zealand) appears to have come from Obama’s CIA Director, John Brennan.
According to Shellenberger, Matt Taibbi and Alex Gutentag, foreign intelligence agencies were asked to conduct the surveillance, including “bumping” the associates — a term for making contact with or casually engaging a target to generate intelligence. These encounters may also have been used to generate intelligence reports used to support further intelligence efforts by the United States in the Russian investigation.
The journalists reported that Britain’s Government Communications Headquarters intelligence apparatus, or GCHQ, went ahead in contacting the Trump’s associates as early as March 2016.
Keep in mind that this was the same month that George Papadopoulos joined the Trump campaign as an adviser. It was also when Papadopoulos met a London-based professor, Josef Mifsud, who Papadopoulos was led to believe had “substantial connections to Russian government officials.”
On March 21, 2016, Trump identified Papadopoulos and Carter Page as members of his foreign policy team……If true, the question is the basis for such surveillance of U.S. citizens associated with the opposing political party and a presidential campaign.
The role of Brennan is intriguing. Brennan was the one who briefed President Barack Obama on Hillary Clinton’s alleged “plan” to tie then-candidate Donald Trump to Russia as “a means of distracting the public from her use of a private email server.”
It was also Brennan who later declared during the Trump Administration that a press conference with Vladimir Putin was “nothing short of treason.” He later said that he did not mean real treason when he said it was nothing short of treason.
Brennan also signed the infamous letter warning that the Hunter Biden laptop had all of the markings of Russian intelligence, a letter that he later admitted was “political.”
Now these sources are claiming that agents from the Five Eyes “were making contacts and bumping Trump people going back to March 2016.”
Former FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith was sentenced to probation in 2021 after admitting that he falsified evidence to renew a wiretap against former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page.
Shellenberger and Taibbi have a record of investigating in areas long avoided by other journalists, particularly in exposing the massive censorship system funded and coordinated by the government. There is much to learn about these allegations and their underlying support. If proven, it would appear that neither the Inspector General nor John Durham were given the full picture of the origins of the Russian investigation. Moreover, there are intriguing questions over a referenced binder that sources said contained much of this intelligence and analysis. That binder or binders allegedly disappeared from the CIA.
Once again, this is still the early reporting and we need to have more confirmation on these facts. However, Congress should be interested in whether the origins for the Russian investigation began with nudges from American intelligence in 2016 to the “Five Eyes.”
there are plenty of issues
one of them is degradation of the work
the posting of sauceless reports hasn't been a big problem previously
there's a spike now, espec. in certain breads
it's either growing carelessness or an OP
either way, needs more EYES ON