>>22595915 pb
>100% tariff on anyone that joins BRICS. Trump said BRICS was dead the moment he said that.
you believe 17% of the world's GDP gonna DICTATE to the other 87%?
that's a special kind of stupid
*83%
mark your calendar
check the vegas odds for the over/under on how long before DJT begs to join BRICS
>Over 400 million to 450 million people are expected to attend
only takes one person with hemorrhagic virus to wipe out 4-6% of humanity
>they WILL use whatever power they have to hurt you
the vilest tyrants are those with the least power
makes them especially vindictive
also…
he could sue their asses off and put the sheboon outta work permanently
terms of settlement include she loses here med license
>If a person is caught red-handed commiting a crime is it still alledged?
sadly yes…
ought to be an exeption from trial, and go straight to sentencing
looks like ACLU is lurking tonite
he deserves a medal for not breaking that finger off
>>22594984 pb
>Javier Milei Faces Impeachment After Endorsing $107 Million Crypto Rug-Pull
milei is a coin-clipper, so i trust him as far as i can throw him
but this reeks of a DS plot to discredit and depose him for the bargain price of $107mm
>This was a skit. Amazing that people believe the bad acting.
amazing that (((YOU))) alone can spot the fakery
was being facetious, anon
lots of physical properties could be measured w/o destroying the bars
but STILL involves testing every single ingot
that alone is a herculean task, since they weigh close to 100lbs each
>Very close in weight to gold.
OMG…
nothing more dangerous than a little bit of knowledge
what you need to compare is the BULK DENSITIES
not the atomic masses
read a fucking book
sauce?
>Sure, I made a mistake because fraudsters can salt gold bars with tungsten.
you made a mistake by suggesting that comparing atomic weight had any significance whatsoever
do you grasp the difference between weight and density?
which weighs more, a pound of lead or a pound of your brains?
nevermind… your pea brain couldn't possibly weigh a pound
>What if the gold is going off planet?
why extract gold from a huge gravity well when you can mine it from asteroids in freefall?
if they have interstellar transportation, i'm sure they would have robots to mine asteroids
they would STILL have the HUGE extra expense of moving it out of a huge gravity well
what part of that escapes your limited conceptual capabilities?
>but gold is much denser than tungsten, meaning it would take up much less space.
FFS…
i posted this an HOUR ago
tungsten: Density (at 20° C) 19.254 g/cm3
gold: Density (at 20° C) 19.283 g/cm3
the difference is 0.15%, so the difference in volume would also be 0.15%, or 1.5 parts per thousand
the fact that you did such unnecessarily round-about calculations to arrive at the WRONG answer only proves what a TOTAL FUCKWIT you are, incapable of critical thinking
just STFU before you embarrass yourself further
you've proven conclusively you have no brains and limited education
at least demonstrate a modicum of CHARACTER
apologize to the board, then thank me for the free 5th grade science lesson
if they have stargate tech
don't you think they could mfgr gold?
put the comic books down and step away from the keyboard, child
>Gravity is a non factor for them. They need it to restore the atmosphere of their planet.
if they have antigravity tech
don't you think they could mfgr gold?
put the comic books down and step away from the keyboard, child