>>22604202 PB
> 1971 study showed negative effects of wifi/cell phone signals.
Interesting!
The "cellphones" back then were normally on 400 to 450 MHz and were TACS which means they were analog and required higher power than the pocket model smartphones of today. They also were one call per channel and abase station could only handle an equal number of simultaneous calls that it had transceivers for. The current era of pocket models began around 1993 and one tranceiver could handle 8 simultaneous calls. 3G multiplied that and LTE multiplied it again to around 256 calls per tranciever so each mobile station shared the 31.62W the tranceiver is capable of. 3G introduced the concept of connecting to multiple cells to provide an apparent gain in signal and LTE/5G has increased that from the 3 multiple connections to as much as 512 multiple connections in 5G. That's how it gains its speed. Most 5G service around the world is still on frequencies below 10GHz. only the USA and, if memory serves, Japan have possible service on THz frequencies. In many countries, the old analog TV bands are being repurposed to allow for the 5G service to be used there. I guess you could call me a phone-fag as I have many years experience in the field and, no, none of my colleagues has died from cancer due to exposure to cellular radio frequencies. We've been exposed to them and use them daily since the digital era's inception in 1993. Yes, that is before the official launch in many countries. If you are rolling the service out, you get early access.
I know tl:dr