Anonymous ID: 0acfd8 Feb. 21, 2025, 9:11 a.m. No.22626681   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>22626637

The EU war pigs and their WEF/Soros puppet Zelensky are trying to manufacture a narrative calling Trump and his supporters "traitors" for no longer supporting a lost cause and not igniting World War III. Basically their narrative is to shame us, make it look like we betrayed "democracy" or some shit. In reality, these assholes are war pigs, they expect We The People to fight and die in some third world failed state for them. Well hell no! Enough. If they wish to fight Russia it's the war pigs running those governments that should be sent to the meat grinder. Let them fight for whatever it is they believe in.

Anonymous ID: 0acfd8 Feb. 21, 2025, 9:44 a.m. No.22626918   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>22626887

I'm not saying you are a liar. I'm just saying please prove it, or these claims will be ignored if there is no screenshot proof. Exactly what is being deleted? I have only seen one post deleted so far today. It was basically regurgitation of state-run propaganda and utter lies. I'm not too worried unless legit info is being deleted.

Anonymous ID: 0acfd8 Feb. 21, 2025, 9:51 a.m. No.22626965   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>22626938

And that's the reason so many younger folks now reject joining the US military anymore. As long as these Zionist neo-con war pigs stay in power and have influence over our entire foreign policy, it's best to just not join up to become cannon fodder for the war pigs.

Anonymous ID: 0acfd8 Feb. 21, 2025, 10:20 a.m. No.22627161   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>22627127

He does make one point though, where Trump may lack is his "job approval" rating, rather than what Hannity pointed out which most support the agendas of the President Trump. Trump is going to have to show some very Good!โ„ข results within the next year or so, or he'll probably start to slip in support. It's an uphill battle considering the damage already inflicted to America over the last 2 to 3 decades of systemic corruption, abuse, fraud, waste, insolvency.

Anonymous ID: 0acfd8 Feb. 21, 2025, 10:37 a.m. No.22627242   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7316

>>22627221

>>22627224

It would hurt both economies very badly. Like it or not, our supply chain does HEAVILY rely on global trade today. You want to destroy that global supply chain? Get ready for hyperinflation, astronomical prices, social unrest and very basic utilities and goods to become hard to find and very expensive. Massive disruption to our way of life. Yes, it would hurt China moreโ€ฆ.. but at the expense of the Trump presidency too.

Anonymous ID: 0acfd8 Feb. 21, 2025, 10:50 a.m. No.22627327   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>22627304

I agree. I also think should tell them "look, if you want a direct war with Russia, have at it, but we will NOT get involved with that, and you will have to pay your fair share for NATO if you do! No more bailouts from the American people or our troops!" Trump needs to get ahead of it, and soon!

Anonymous ID: 0acfd8 Feb. 21, 2025, 10:55 a.m. No.22627354   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>22627316

I would hurt China more than us, that is correct. Shutting down all our trade with China would still hurt our own service-based economy though. I can't see struggling Americans coping with more price inflation, it's already bad enough as it is.

 

Reciprocal tariffs are a good idea though, that makes sense.