bravo!
if they argue: Biden was not competent, he couldn't have known what he was doing, can a judge rule: all of your pardons are nothing?
the last four decades, don't you mean, anon?
>>22626786
Behold the shill narrative.
they think that they 'say' what Q Reasearch 'Is'.
they use adjectives and verbs that indicate decay and dispair.
they have a harsh narrative about how awful it is at these breads.
meanwhile it's there efforts that make it aweful.
It's there spam that is the rancid-crumble.
they are the cause of that which they describe.
then, when they are deleted, because that is the new normal they REE about censorship and the First Ammendment.
but their spam floods disrespect the idea of free speach, so we know that they don't reallly care about censorship. probably if they could they'd delete all the posts that they don't like just like.
anyway
no one cares about your analysis of these boards. If you have no digs to post, or new, or memes, then please refrain from your attempts at spell casting about who the anon are and what Q Research is about.
you have no clue at all.
if the shills were in charge of policing the board and deleting what they would:
the board log would say
shill deleted the whole board