>>22652428

Respectfully, anon feels the EXACT same way. With that in mind, consider how effective their shutdown and the return of the lost children will be at this moment, prior to cleansing of the judicial system.

Again, it's all got to be legal, so there's still intervening steps to be taken.

Anon feels that every single person involved in CPS / DSS should be immediately arrested and charged with federal kidnapping, with the LEOs that acted in concert facing the same charges.

Since the courts are populated by lawyers and evil bastards, until that's cleaned out and the fear of justice is restored IN THE "just us" system, nothing would be accomplished and we'd lose the chance to really fry these people as they deserve due to "double jeopardy", a legal principle where one can't be tried for the same crime twice.

>>22652435

Need a broader societal exposure to the idea of "jury nullification".

Once society is aware of their power, then discussions about specific issues may be more effective.

Would be wonderful to actually get jury trials where the judge is afraid for his own freedom if they make a mistake.

>>22652557

Instant resignations across their entire orgs since they don't outrank DJT.

Easy way to play the game. Any holdouts now can be immediately dismissed without recourse because they voluntarily resigned.

Also would mean no federal pensions for them. What a win that would be.

>>22652611

I feel the exact same way. Would prefer to see every human being involved in CPS / DSS just walked out to the gallows directly in front of their offices.

CPS / DSS was used against anon by anon's ex to try to take kid away from a 50/50 custody. Anon has personal reason to despise them.

Yes the kids need to be returned immediately.

>>22652829

Not sure that's the message being presented here. They made 7 figures last year. How? Who bought them? Awfully interesting.

>>22652878

"Successful podcasts" so obviously they couldn't be compromised in the exact same way that, say, MSNBC is because of what reason?

Also attempting to say that their deals magically disappeared simply because they are now employed in the Trump admin is also disingenuous.

Not saying they are deep state, only curious, as it's odd everyone involved in or tangental to government magically gets rich somehow.

Obamas get book deals, Bidens get to sell worthless "art" guess the "good" guys get "podcasts and merch sales".

Still sus.

>>22652892

Didn't claim that investigations should stop.

Haven't discouraged discussion about other major issues.

Asked a relevant question. Anon is curious as to WHY these two were paid 7 figures. The media is controlled, so who paid them and for what purposes. Fox is nothing more than controlled oppo.

The argument seems to go "if they're paid by people we like, they're good guys, but if they're paid by people we don't like, they're enemies", when it would be better stated: "If anyone is in government, or government adjacent, and they suddenly start making 7+ figures for their commentary / merch only to be placed in influential positions in government immediately thereafter, perhaps they should be subjected to the same level of scrutiny that members of congress are".

Ask the SAME questions of everyone, instead of picking winners and losers. Feels like the exact same thing the democrats did for decades.