Anonymous ID: c58323 Feb. 28, 2025, 8:27 a.m. No.22673635   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3725 >>3745 >>3789

Spouse anon needs a tooth extraction and has an appointment in a couple of weeks. Anon has been on the phone all morning with specialists asking if nano technology in local anesthesia can be avoided and exactly what did the anesthesia that they used contains.

 

Result:The dentist cancelled the appointment and told spouse anon to go to the hospital.

 

In other words, they didn't want the liability after giving the required full disclosure to the patient.

 

Placing calls to other dentists, they said that ALL brands now contain nano technology in local anesthesia and there is no further choice.

 

This may be anicdotal, but I suggest everyone just ask your dentist for verification.

 

GOOD LUCK.

Anonymous ID: c58323 Feb. 28, 2025, 8:49 a.m. No.22673772   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>22673725

 

Correct.

 

However, the hospital can afford the law suit when anon gets horrible disease caused by the nano in the local anesthetic.

 

OR

 

The hospital will just knock out anon and pull the tooth. No further pain killer needed. Just ice. (Expensive way to pull a tooth, though.)