show the social media bots you are referencing in your data collection that is being attributed to anon opinions regarding polls
kek @ all these boomers shitting on RRN while cnn/fox is on in their background right now
if you don't even know who he is, how can you claim he came from nowhere?
how familiar are you with snake plissen, the source of the clickbait expose channel that is the go-to for "proving" rrn is fake
funny how no link or timestamp is required on this particular post being used as a proof
kek
>Funny how you've used that argument before
funny how it always gets deflected
sauce is always important
>Their purpose to give the MSM the "QAnon people are absolute tinfoil hat wearing nutcases" narrative.
do you care if MSM has this opinion? do you care if MSM viewers have this opinion?
kek
link was just as included in the request as timestamp
why ignore one half of the equation? it all matters equally
link+timestamp is bare minimum basics, everyone knows this
look, if you don't have the original source for the image you keep reposting then just say so
nobody will be surprised to find out
bread @ 600+ and that's the first post you see the need to respond to
not all ghosts are as they seem
>They are trying so hard to get anons to click on their articles
seems like all they do is post the article once and move on
check the ID of the RRN OP this bread to verify
shills won't do this
that is not an accurate recount of what takes place
easily checked by looking at the replies to that RRN anon's OP and seeing which attackers came first
the fact you somehow think people can't discern this is interesting
reasonable response