Anonymous ID: 345528 (YOU) March 5, 2025, 2:22 p.m. No.22709626   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9647

>>22709600

Did you read it?

The inferior court issued an order that is ultra virus (without legal authority) the mechanism should not be for the supirior courts to issue a restraint on an order that lacks legal authority

He can just ignore it is what they are arguing

 

Dumb niggers

Anonymous ID: 345528 March 5, 2025, 2:28 p.m. No.22709670   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9708

>>22709647

Prove that the executive has 100% authority to decide?

Show me where they said he had to pay?

They didn't they said they won't issue the stay, wont issue a stay on a order with no authority

 

Again did you read it?

Anonymous ID: 345528 March 5, 2025, 2:35 p.m. No.22709694   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>22709675

Let me explain like anons are tarded

I say you are guilty of being faggot you owe me a million dollars and need to pay, but I don't have any authority to do that, you take the bullshit to the court and ask them to rule on my order? They said get this unlawfull junk out of here why do we have to issue a restraint on trash with no merit

Anonymous ID: 345528 March 5, 2025, 2:42 p.m. No.22709745   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9805

>>22709708

Anon, There is nothing to prove the justices decided to be ambiguous to help fake news with the orange man wrong narrative, but all that the argument is is about a restraint on a order, that is not lawful in the first place, the memechanism to ignore it or not recognize it at all not restrain it lmfao