Did the barristers at Perkins Coie actually go through the proper administrative channels to challenge the removal/revocation of their clearance?
Willing to bet President Trump got them for -
Misuse of IT Systems: Under Guideline M, the government may have security concerns related to the misuse of information technology systems as it tends to show an inability in the holder’s ability to follow laws, rules, and regulations and thus creates a heightened risk of coercion, exploitation, or duress.
Not to mention that the FBI had a secure space within Perkins Coie office…
Did Perkins Coie just get right down to the lawyerly approach or did they submit a written rebuttal to a Statement of Reasons (SOR) or Letter of Intent (LOI) to pull/revoke clearance? Did they attend a hearing with the Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals (DOHA) or pursue other appropriate administrative channels via the FBI depending?
meh
doubt it
why
they would have been flat busted otra vez