“We Were On The Brink Of WWIII.” Jack Posobiec Reacts To DoD Signal Chat Leak
11:44
https://rumble.com/embed/v6oyyf2/?pub=4
“We Were On The Brink Of WWIII.” Jack Posobiec Reacts To DoD Signal Chat Leak
11:44
https://rumble.com/embed/v6oyyf2/?pub=4
Steve Bannon: “They’ve Made Jeffrey Goldberg A Central Part Of The Story.”
11:50
https://rumble.com/embed/v6oz0ti/?pub=4
=Signalgate: President Trump Stands by Mike Waltz – Attributing Signal App Issue to Waltz Staffer Who Accidentally Added Journalist==
March 25, 2025 | Sundance |
President Trump has given remarks supporting National Security Advisor Mike Waltz during an interview with NBC.
WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump stood by his national security adviser, Mike Waltz, after The Atlantic’s editor-in-chief was accidentally added to a private, high-level chat on the messaging app Signal where military plans were being discussed.
“Michael Waltz has learned a lesson, and he’s a good man,” Trump said Tuesday in a phone interview with NBC News.
When asked what he was told about how Goldberg came to be added to the Signal chat, Trump said, “It was one of Michael’s people on the phone. A staffer had his number on there.”
Trump said Goldberg’s presence in the chat had “no impact at all” on the military operation.
The president expressed confidence in his team, saying he was not frustrated by the events leading up to The Atlantic’s story. The situation, Trump said, was “the only glitch in two months, and it turned out not to be a serious one.” (more)
The rest of the DC setup is transparently clear. (1) Goldberg held the story until the day before a long-scheduled Senate Intelligence Committee hearing. (2) The SSCI then used the hearing to blast the heads of the Trump administration intelligence silos on the issue of “classified” information in the text messages.
♦ The next act in this well-known performance will be for Democrats to demand the release of the Signal App transcript, if it’s not classified, then there’s nothing to hide.
♦ Public pressure via narrative drum-pounding will continue to increase, until the chat messages are released to congress. [Keep in mind, Jeffrey Goldberg likely already has them.]
♦ Everyone in the chat group will then be told they must recuse themselves from internal silo determinations as to the classified status of the conversation. More public pressure will be generated to achieve this “position of conflict” demand.
♦ The Intelligence Community, without the heads of the silos – likely leveraging the internal investigative agents of the FBI (INSD), will then say the content of the chat was indeed classified, TSCI level. There will be weeks and months of leaks to the media as each granular detail is discussed ad infinitum.
♦ The cabinet members will then face the drumbeat of resignation demands, and/or useful impeachment fodder for ‘lying to congress’ during today’s Senate Select Committee on Intelligence testimony.
At least that should be the anticipated approach by the “Seven Ways from Sunday” group, who operate to defend the interests of the Intelligence Community from agency heads like those who were on the Signal App chat group.
We’ve all watched this play before.
(Bannon and Poso said the same things)
This is where Trump forbids them from turning over any info to the Senate, and shuts the damn Hoax down. Wouldn’t surprise if there aninvestigation going on behind the scenes finding out who and how many set this up.
It’s time for some Dem and Rep Senators dirty secrets to come out publicly.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2025/03/25/signalgate-president-trump-stands-by-mike-waltz-attributing-signal-app-issue-to-waltz-staffer-who-accidentally-added-journalist/
Colorado Senator Mike Bennet Goes Bananas Questioning CIA Director Ratcliffe
March 25, 2025 | Sundance |
As expected, the Democrats were ready to pounce when Trump intelligence officials appeared before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI).Almost as if their staff had pre-planned a series of questions to ask Tulsi Gabbard and Director John Ratcliffe.
In this heated exchange, Colorado Democrat Senator Mike Bennet goes fully bananas when questioning CIA Director John Ratcliffe.These are not stable people. WATCH:
https://youtu.be/KLkfWJZS3kE
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2025/03/25/colorado-senator-mike-bennet-goes-bananas-questioning-cia-director-ratcliffe/
Dem Rep. Kaptur: Dems Don’t Have a Plan for Economic Progress
Ian Hanchett25 Mar 2025
During portions of an interview with NPR aired on Monday’s broadcast of “All Things Considered,” Rep. Marcy Kaptur (D-OH) declared that Democrats “better shape up and put together a plan for progress, starting in the places that have fallen behind where people are voting for change simply because the economy is not working for them.” And that those voters voted for Donald Trump because they knew where they live isn’t great.
Kaptur said, “They heard President Trump say, Make America Great Again. That was something they want to do, and they know where they live isn’t. They’ve seen factories close. So, we need to keep our eyes laser beam focused on how do we expand opportunity.”
NPR Correspondent Barbara Sprunt then said, “She says Democrats haven’t messaged clear enough plans on how to grow the economy.”
Sprunt then played a clip where Kaptur said, “I have different mottos I live by, and one of them is, economics is not destiny, but it is 85% of it.And the Democrats better shape up and put together a plan for progress, starting in the places that have fallen behind where people are voting for change simply because the economy is not working for them.”
https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2025/03/25/dem-rep-kaptur-dems-dont-have-a-plan-for-economic-progress/
Finally one of the Dems giving a fuck about the people!
Suozzi: It’s Not Clear What Dems Stand for Outside of Abortion, LGBT Issues, Need to Focus More on JobsDuhhh!
Ian Hanchett25 Mar 2025
During portions of an interview with NPR aired on Monday’s broadcast of “All Things Considered,” Rep. Tom Suozzi (D-NY) said that it’s clear Republicans want to shrink government and cut taxes, but what Democrats want to do on anything other than abortion and LGBT rights is unclear.
Suozzi said, “We can’t just resist. It can’t just be why we’re against Trump and what’s wrong with Trump.” And that “the Democratic brand has been damaged.”
NPR Correspondent Barbara Sprunt then said, “He says Republicans have done a better job at marketing their ideas.”
She then played a clip where Suozzi said, “When you ask people, you say, well, what do the Republicans stand for?They say, well, Make American Great Again, they want to cut the size of government, they want to give tax cuts, stuff like–. And what do the Democrats stand for?And I think the people are kind of scratching their head a little bit, they believe in, like, choice and LGBT rights — which I believe in those things too — but I don’t know that you can build a whole party around that.”
Sprunt then stated, “He nods to his own campaign where he won an issue that, traditionally, puts Democrats on defense: Immigration.”
She then played a clip where Suozzi stated, “I was running on the issue of the border. So, the consultants come to me and they say, well, Tom, that’s a Republican issue, I don’t know if you should be talking —I said, no, this is what the people of my district are talking about. We can’t ignore what the people are talking about.”
NPR also reported that Suozzi said, “We need to do more things that show we are in favor of creating jobs that pay good wages to people that are willing to work hard,” and “That is part of the historic Democratic brand and we’ve just lost that.”
(They never come to the conclusion to work with Republicans to make life better for their few voters they have left. There biggest problem is they have embraced resistance to anything that is practical. Hating Trump is not a winning strategy, it’s old and tiresome.)
https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2025/03/25/suozzi-its-not-clear-what-dems-stand-for-outside-of-abortion-lgbt-issues-need-to-focus-more-on-jobs/
Liberal Dark Money Network Arabella Advisors and Other Progressive Non-Profits Are Behind the Push for the IRS’s Direct File Initiative
24 Mar 2025
A network of progressive non-profits has quietly spent years pushing the IRS’s new “Direct File” service.
Progressive supporters of Direct File claim to advocate for low-income taxpayers.Research shows that key organizations promoting Direct File are closely tied to Arabella Advisors and its billion-dollar network of left-leaning dark money groups.
One Arabella-backed organization, the Economic Security Project (ESP), has funded advertising and research in support of Direct File.Last year, the group received a $752,197 grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundationto “conduct research on the impact and usage” of Direct File.
That work culminated in a media blitz encouraging largely low-income taxpayers to adopt Direct File, which was first made available as a pilot program in 2024 for taxpayers across a dozen states. Last year, the IRS agreed to make the program permanent,but it has since come under fire from the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Trump-appointed Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent agreed to temporarily keep the program through the 2025 tax season, earning him praise from progressive groups including ESP.
ESP is fiscally sponsored by the Hopewell Fund, a nonprofit managed by Arabella Advisors. The arrangement allows ESP to operate as a project of the Hopewell Fund, taking advantage of Hopewell’s nonprofit status without having to register with the IRS or publicly disclose its own finances.
ESP’s goal isn’t simply to make filing taxes easier. Adam Ruben, a former aide to Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) who is now managing outreach for the group, called Direct File “[o]ne of the best tools we haveto create the infrastructure for guaranteed income in this country” and said Direct File “is a huge opportunity for economic security and racial equity.”
Groundwork Collaborative, another non-profit receiving funding through the Arabella Network, has led its own media blitz supporting Direct File. Groundwork Action, the group’s advocacy arm, funded a “Better IRS” ad campaign promoting direct file and attacking private-sector tax preparers. Like ESP, Groundwork is led by a former policy advisor to Elizabeth Warren.
ESP and Groundwork help fund and operate The Coalition for Free and Fair Filing, which “supports the Internal Revenue Service’s efforts to create a free online direct tax filing tool,” according to the group’s website. “The coalition is composed of organizations committed to racial and economic justice, consumer protection, the advancement of civic technology and the promotion ofequity in tax administration.”
Supporters of Direct File frame it, in part, as an effort to help low-income tax filersand also as a better way to ensure collection of higher tax revenues by the IRS.
Critics of Direct File highlight the inherent conflict of interest in having the IRS prepare people’s tax returns. Last year, a group of Republican Senators challenged the IRS’s ability to unilaterally launch such a program, saying “[s]erious legal questions exist about the IRS Direct File launch,” which was undertaken without Congressional approval.
The IRS initially received funding for a pilot program for an in-house tax filing tool through the Inflation Reduction Act. Last year, Direct File was made available to users in 12 states. For 2025, availability has expanded to 32 million taxpayers in 25 states.
(So they are helping the IRS to mess up the people’s filing, and it’s only for the IRS more taxes from the poor? How much of a cut do these non disclosure orgs collect from the IRS to steal money from the poor?)
Jacob McLeod is a researcher and writer focusing primarily on corruption in politics.
(https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025/03/24/liberal-dark-money-network-arabella-advisors-and-other-progressive-non-profits-are-behind-the-push-for-the-irss-direct-file-initiative/
A lower income tax payer files a short form, what a rip off this is to low earners
Why do most grifter leftists look so typical, fat, ugly and gross.
They should but they won’t, the majority of the dems are radical women and they like it that way
>>22820947 ✅ CONFIRMED: Dr. Jay Bhattacharya as Director of the NIH.PN
This is the Greatest Justice of all time. In the first month of Covid he was doing research and testing on how many in the Los Angeles County, had Covid or were sick and the testing & the results came back ==that over 70%+ already had Covid so he suspected based on results it as not a pandemic.
Fauci etc probably saw that, and had to destroy him because if that got outthe whole “Kill As Many People Plot Worldwide” wouldn’t have occurred.
Jay B, is a world renown Researcher and Doctor, along with all the others that got slandered. I hope Dr. McCoulugh, with Dr Corey and all the others that were destroyed financially and the history of Top doctors, the highly regarded reputations are restored and work for Jay or RFKjr, they deserve the great work and their passion back.
That will change the whole medical corruption of doctors treating patients and killing them.
God’s Justice is coming in a Big Way and it will catch fire WW
Waltz better be suspecting Wong, he set up the invites. And why in the hell didn’t he double check the list if it was confidential before the discussion started? He can’t just think he didn’t do it on purpose, unless Waltz is in the plan for another Russiagate.
Something very fishy here Waltz’ relationship with the Bush Factor is not cool. And if he is a diehard Neocon he doesn’t belong with Trump.
Can someone post this on Dans X, otters will not bring it to Trump’s attention.
BTW why would Vance withhold his opinion from Trump on how he thought it was a bad idea? How many times does he withhold his opinion? Why fake agreement?That bothered me as much as the rest.
>>22821714
Gossip and Lies
>>22821716
Bullshit propaganda go somewhere else troll
Good answer and I think it’s true. I wouldn’t be surprised if they already have the suspect or suspects fingered. It may be a few more than that one guy. Was he bribed?
That’s reallynotable