tyb
Why Democrats Attack Hallucinations
The Dilbert Guy (
@ScottAdamsSays
) says we should create a Department of Imaginary Concerns to help Democrats stop fretting about fossil fuels and White supremacy.
I say he's right. If we'd had a Department of Imaginary Concerns 50 years ago, Dems might have wasted less money fighting acid rain, topsoil loss, and overpopulation.
Heh. Overpopulation. Sometimes it seems like all Democrat concerns are imaginary.
I figured out why.
Are you ready for it?
Here it is: Democrat concerns must be imaginary, because they are the party of envy.
Okay that sounds dumb, even to me, but I'll back it up.
https://x.com/DrInsensitive/status/1906312745751810455
Evening, citizen.
continues…
If you know an insecure man, you've probably noticed he spends a lot of time criticizing successful men, and you probably know why.
That's Democrat men. They compulsively demonize every good man, to reduce the yawning status gap between themselves and men who aren't fvckups.
But, you might object, that's a male malfunction. Women LOVE successful men, so why would Dem women demonize them?
(Are you wondering what this has to do with imaginary concerns? Bear with me; I'm working up to that.)
When asked why he robbed banks, Willie Sutton famously replied, "Because that's where the money is."
That's Democrat women.
When asked, under truth serum, why they demonize useful men, Democrat women would answer, "Because that's where the money is."
Democrat men would add, "Because I'm afraid my wife prefers him."
continues…
This is why no Democrat politician has achieved anything outside of politics. If he did, he would disqualify himself for office. The Democrats cannot have their own Elon Musk or Donald Trump, because Democrat men would never vote for a man who outshines them, and Democrat women would instinctively attack him like a cat instinctively attacks any running food.
Instead of Elon Musk and Donald Trump, the Democrats have Bernie Sanders, Joe Biden, and Elizabeth Warren, leaders who got rich by fraud.
Even their successful academics, men like Nobel laureate Paul Krugman and, until recently, Alan Dershowitz, dare not run for office because they are too respectable.
But fraudsters like Elizabeth Warren can, because her fraud does not shame her voters by the contrast, and does not trigger their cat instinct.
Cat's don't eat each other.
Bernie's 100% failure rate in business ventures, and his wife's startling success in bankrupting the university she managed, would disqualify him in the eyes of Republicans. Yet those fiascos endear him to Democrat voters who rarely get a chance to feel superior.
So why must Democrat "concerns" be imaginary? The answer is simple: All of their concerns are strategic, designed to advance the mission.
The mission is to discredit successful men, so they can be brought low and plundered.
If your goal is demonize the men who do things right, then by simple logic, you must demonize right things.
Who made acid rain? The men who generate electricity.
Who overpopulated the world? Men who can support large families.
Who depleted the topsoil? Successful farmers.
(Yes, I know; these worries sound stupid now, but I assure you Dems took them VERY seriously.)
Who warms the climate? The men who supply the energy that lifts us out of savagery by giving each of us the machine equivalent of 50 slaves.
Who is to blame for white supremacy? I'll let you answer that one.
Such men must be demonized; otherwise they cannot be plundered, and they might suck up all the pussy.
Since they must demonize the men who do things right, Democrats must demonize right things.
Which is why their "concerns" are always so stupid.