Anonymous ID: f36cdf April 29, 2025, 5:11 p.m. No.22972060   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2064

Cops Don't Know The Law - Don't Care About Rights. They think they get to demand ID and detain for a constitutionally protected activity in public then illegally search him for his ID.

 

What good are our rights when cops violate them every fucking day? They need to be treated like the domestic terrorists they are.

Anonymous ID: f36cdf April 29, 2025, 5:36 p.m. No.22972141   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2143 >>2145 >>2183

Cop who claims he's a vet thinks holding sign in public saying "God Bless the Homeless Vets" is a crime he can demand ID for. He acknowledges is constitutionally protected, but says he can still be taken to jail at any point and "I literally don't care" about rights.

 

"This isn't some free will state man this is how it is in the state of Mississippi"

 

They are domestic enemies to the Constitution of the United States of America and We the People it represents.

Anonymous ID: f36cdf April 29, 2025, 5:44 p.m. No.22972168   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2176

>>22972159

"Allege" as I post videos of cops blatantly violating the law kek.

 

As I've repeatedly said here, we need to put them back in their place (servants) and as a nation admit they have been blatantly violating our rights and constitution.

 

Our nation needs to confess her sins.

Anonymous ID: f36cdf April 29, 2025, 5:49 p.m. No.22972187   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2191 >>2196 >>2199

>>22972176

Notice you ignore what I said and project. Same bullshit different day.

 

Who do you thinks dividing you dumbfuck??? Look at their fucking flag. They don't hide it, they don't care. Either you support and defend the constitution of the United States or you stand back and defend the domestic terrorists violating it every fucking day.

Anonymous ID: f36cdf April 29, 2025, 6:06 p.m. No.22972257   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2264

Arrested & Held In Jail For A Week For Speaking In Public

 

In 1987, the US Supreme Court invalidated as unconstitutional a Houston Texas ordinance that read "โ€œIt shall be unlawful for any person to assault, strike or in any manner oppose, molest, abuse or interrupt any policeman in the execution of his duty, or any person summoned to aid in making an arrest.โ€ Their reasoning? Free and protected speech is not and can not be considered interference.

 

Justice William J. Brennan Jr., who authored the Courtโ€™s opinion, wrote that โ€œthe First Amendment protects a significant amount of verbal criticism and challenge directed at police officers.โ€ He added that theโ€œfreedom of individuals verbally to oppose or challenge police action without thereby risking arrest is one of the principal characteristics by which we distinguish a free nation from a police state.โ€

Anonymous ID: f36cdf April 29, 2025, 6:27 p.m. No.22972335   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Arrested for Free Speech, on His Property, with No Warrant

 

"When you're making the comments you're making on facebook that kinda brings issue to me"

 

Land of the free right???

Anonymous ID: f36cdf April 29, 2025, 6:30 p.m. No.22972348   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>22972329

Cops QI is upheld unless there is a similar case with similar circumstances where another cop was found to have violated rights so they would "reasonably know" what they were doing was a violation of rights. Ignorance of the law is an excuse as long as you're in law enforcement.

 

I've even seen them argue with a three judge panel asking to "show me the case" saying a cop can't stand and physically block a man from exiting his car and then charge him for obstruction for failing to exit. QI is an abomination and violation of equal protection under the law.