>>23013769

I've seriously come to wonder if admin get paid for the number of notables considering the size and quality of the shit that currently serves as the notable buns today.

MAKE NOTABLES GREAT AGAIN!

>>23013865

> kinda just faded away

You mean like the Fort Knox audit and so many other things?

>>23013934

Not sure I agree. There are still Q related topics to dig on and proofs and a whole lot more, but we now get NASA pic of the day;

There are those screaming for arrests, but at least we now have Letitia James indicted.

Start of D5?