5.9.2025
Canada’s Chief Public Health Officer Among Dozens Who Signed Oath to Conceal COVID Info That Could ‘Embarrass’ Trudeau Government
https://yournews.com/2025/05/09/3428426/canadas-chief-public-health-officer-among-dozens-who-signed-oath/
https://archive.ph/cKfpW
Newly released records show Canada’s top doctor and federal managers signed confidentiality pledges during the COVID crisis to avoid disclosures that could damage government credibility.
Canada’s Chief Public Health Officer, Dr. Theresa Tam, and nearly 30 senior federal health officials signed a confidential oath during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, pledging not to release information that could “embarrass” the Trudeau cabinet, according to internal records obtained through Access to Information requests.
The oath, revealed by Blacklock’s Reporter, was part of a broader secrecy policy within the Public Health Agency and other government departments including Health, Industry, Foreign Affairs, and National Defence. Internal communications from 2020 show that vaccine supply manager Alan Thom voiced concern about the widespread requirement for federal managers to sign non-disclosure agreements, noting, “at a certain point the Department of Public Works determined individual non-disclosure agreements were no longer needed… as we are all covered through our responsibilities as public servants.”
The confidentiality agreement emphasized that any “unauthorized disclosure of confidential information… may result in embarrassment, criticism or claims against Canada and may jeopardize Canada’s supplier relations and procurement processes.” Managers acknowledged their ongoing obligations under the Values And Ethics Code For The Public Sector, according to the documents.
The oaths were signed shortly after the Trudeau administration secured billions in COVID-19 vaccine contracts with companies including Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, Novavax, Johnson & Johnson, Medicago, and Sanofi. Dr. Tam, a longtime proponent of mass vaccination, oversaw public messaging during the rollout.
The first mRNA vaccine to be approved in Canada was Pfizer’s BioNTech shot, authorized on December 9, 2020, followed closely by Moderna’s vaccine. The approvals came after the Trudeau government granted vaccine manufacturers legal immunity from liability for adverse effects. Parliamentarians requesting to review those contracts were denied access.
In response to growing reports of vaccine-related injuries, Canada launched its Vaccine Injury Support Program (VISP) in late 2020. As reported by LifeSiteNews, the program was created after legal protections were granted to pharmaceutical companies. A memo from Canada’s Department of Health now warns that VISP payouts are set to exceed the program’s original $75 million budget, prompting the federal government to allocate an additional $36 million.
Despite dwindling public demand, the government continues to purchase new doses, even as its own statistics show widespread rejection of booster injections by Canadians. Compounding concerns, an inhalable mRNA vaccine—developed using fetal cell lines and funded by Ottawa—has now entered Phase 2 clinical trials.
Data from Statistics Canada also indicates that post-vaccine rollout, deaths attributed to COVID-19 and “unspecified causes” significantly increased, raising further questions about the long-term safety and effectiveness of the vaccine campaign.
LifeSiteNews has compiled an extensive archive of research linking COVID mRNA injections to adverse events such as myocarditis, blood clots, and fertility issues. Additional findings highlight risks in children, while all currently available COVID shots have ties to abortion-derived fetal cell lines.
With growing scrutiny over vaccine safety and government transparency, the revelation that Canada’s top public health officials signed agreements to avoid reputational harm to federal leadership adds another layer of controversy to the country’s pandemic response.
5.15.2025
Rubio: We hope the Syrian authorities will seize the opportunity of lifting sanctions to rebuild.
https://x.com/AlArabiya/status/1922906737377436017
5.15.2025
Analysis | Can Trump's Sanctions Relief Make Syria Great Again?
Presidential bombast aside, certainly not. But the policy signals a new attitude toward Damascus that Netanyahu would be wise to adopt
https://archive.ph/2JGXZ
4.07.2025
THE TAX THAT WASN’T SUPPOSED TO SPREAD—BUT DID
The Revenue Act of 1913 was sold as a narrow, high-bracket tax aimed at the rich—just 2% of households would pay.
Yet within five years, wartime pressure turned that top rate from 7% to 77%.
The original promise? Low rates, limited reach.
The reality sadly was a federal lever grew quite fast.
Politicians who passed it later expanded it.
The exemption shrank, the complexity ballooned, and regional resentment flared.
The rich Northeast bore the brunt, sparking cries of class legislation.
A century later, nostalgia for that “simple” tax misses the point: once created, the income tax was always designed to grow.
Original intent didn’t stop political convenience.
https://nothingcanstopwhatiscoming.news/?read=O275363