Previous Bread
My Questions had been asked of AI on Brave to see if it was yet allowed the truth, this often changes by the day to day changes taking place in the world.
How many people have died from the Covid Vaccines so far?
Answer with AI
Press
Up
to highlight.
Share
Open in Leo
This chat is temporary and will not be saved.
Covid Vaccine Deaths
The number of deaths reported after receiving COVID-19 vaccines varies depending on the reporting system and the criteria used to attribute causality. The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) has received over 14,000 reports of deaths following COVID-19 vaccination as of November 2, 2024. However, VAERS is a user-generated reporting system and does not determine causality; these reports need further investigation to confirm if the vaccines were the cause of death.
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) reported that 11,448 deaths in the EU were flagged and recorded in the EudraVigilance database following COVID-19 vaccinations. The EMA emphasizes that the fact that someone has had a medical issue or died after vaccination does not necessarily mean the vaccine was the cause.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has reviewed VAERS reports and found that the true number of deaths currently attributed to COVID-19 vaccines through detailed scientific investigation is quite small.
It is important to note that while some reports suggest a high number of deaths, these numbers often do not account for the large number of people who have been vaccinated and the rigorous scientific investigation required to establish a causal link between the vaccine and death.
In summary, while there have been reports of deaths following vaccination, the number of confirmed deaths directly attributed to the vaccines is much lower and requires further investigation to establish causality.
There must be updated numbers as this is important topic, do you have access?
Found 4 relevant pages for: "updated COVID-19 vaccine death reports 2025"
🌐
🌐
🌐
🌐
As of May 22, 2025, the FDA's advisory committee has recommended that the newest COVID-19 vaccines for the 2025-2026 period target newer strains of the JN.1 variant, specifically the LP.8.1 subvariant, which has been responsible for 70% of total cases in the US over a two-week period ending May 10, 2025.
The committee also discussed the ongoing burden of COVID-19 on the US health system, with an estimated 30,000 to 50,000 deaths and 260,000 to 430,000 hospitalizations since October of the previous year.
Hospitalization and Death Rates: Hospitalization rates have declined overall since 2021-2022, but they remain highest among people older than 65 and children younger than six months old.
Vaccine Access and Trials: The FDA plans to limit access to COVID-19 vaccines to older adults and those at high risk, and has required new clinical trials for approval of annual boosters for healthy Americans under 65.
Vaccine Safety: The FDA has also required Pfizer and Moderna to expand warning labels about the risk of myocarditis and pericarditis, particularly in males ages 16 to 25.
Impact on Vaccine Availability:
Limited Access: The FDA's new policy will limit vaccine access to older adults and high-risk individuals, with an estimated 100 million to 200 million Americans still having access to vaccines.
Clinical Trials: The requirement for new clinical trials for annual boosters could lead to longer wait times for the shots, according to vaccine manufacturers.
Current Circulating Strains:
LP.8.1 Subvariant: This subvariant of the JN.1 strain is currently the predominant circulating strain in the US.
Other Subvariants: Other subvariants, including LF.7 and XFG, have also been increasingly detected in recent weeks.
Vaccine Effectiveness:
Immunity Waning: While almost all people in the US have some level of infection-induced immunity, this immunity is believed to wane over time, making vaccine-induced immunity an "added benefit".
Children and Young Adults: Vaccine effectiveness could not be estimated for 2024-25 in children due to low coverage and relatively low levels of disease compared to earlier seasons.
The Vaccines are the source of all Illness with fake names given to side effects of previous Vaccines to scare people into more Vaccines, isn't this Psychological Warfare on a Captive Population.
It's important to approach this topic with a balanced and evidence-based perspective. The claims that vaccines are the source of all illnesses and that side effects are being falsely named to scare people into more vaccinations are not supported by scientific evidence. Here are some key points to consider:
Vaccine Safety and Side Effects
Extensive Research: Vaccines undergo rigorous testing and clinical trials before they are approved for use. These trials involve thousands of participants and are designed to identify potential side effects and assess safety[1].
Post-Market Surveillance: After vaccines are approved, they are continuously monitored through systems like the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) in the United States. These systems help to detect any rare or long-term side effects that might not have been identified during clinical trials[2].
Transparency and Reporting
Reporting Systems: Systems like VAERS are designed to collect and analyze reports of adverse events following vaccination. However, these reports do not automatically mean that the vaccine caused the event; they are used to flag potential issues for further investigation[3].
Causality Assessment: Health authorities, such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA), conduct thorough investigations to determine if there is a causal link between a vaccine and an adverse event[4].
Public Health and Ethical Considerations
Public Health Benefits: Vaccines have been instrumental in controlling and eradicating many infectious diseases, such as smallpox and polio. They have saved countless lives and prevented significant morbidity[5].
Ethical Standards: The development and distribution of vaccines are guided by strict ethical standards to ensure they are safe and effective. Health authorities are committed to transparency and public trust[6].
Addressing Concerns
Education and Communication: Public health organizations and healthcare providers are working to educate the public about the benefits and risks of vaccines. Clear and accurate information can help address concerns and build trust[7].
Support for Those Affected: For individuals who experience rare but serious side effects, support systems are in place to provide medical care and compensation when appropriate[8].
Conclusion
While it is natural to have concerns about vaccines, it is crucial to rely on scientific evidence and credible sources of information. The overwhelming consensus among public health experts and medical professionals is that vaccines are safe and effective tools for preventing infectious diseases. If you have specific concerns or questions, it is always a good idea to consult with a healthcare provider who can provide personalized advice based on your health status and medical history.
References
CDC: Vaccine Testing and the Approval Process
VAERS: Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System
CDC: Understanding VAERS Data
EMA: Pharmacovigilance in the EU
WHO: Vaccines and Immunization
FDA: Ethical Considerations for Clinical Trials
WHO: Building Trust in Vaccines
HHS: Vaccine Injury Compensation Program
If the fiction of Viruses and Vaccines was for Population Control then all the Science backing it up would also be Fake, how many Scientists are against the agreed upon Science?
The idea that the science backing viruses and vaccines is a fiction for population control is a conspiracy theory that is not supported by the overwhelming body of scientific evidence and the consensus of the global scientific community. Here are some key points to consider:
Scientific Consensus
Peer-Reviewed Research: The vast majority of scientific research on viruses and vaccines is peer-reviewed, meaning it is evaluated by other experts in the field for accuracy and validity. This process helps ensure the quality and reliability of scientific findings.
Global Collaboration: Research on viruses and vaccines involves scientists from multiple countries and institutions, working collaboratively to understand and combat diseases. The scientific community is diverse and includes researchers from a wide range of backgrounds and perspectives.
Ethical Standards
Ethical Guidelines: Scientific research is governed by strict ethical standards to ensure the integrity of the research and the well-being of participants. These guidelines are enforced by institutional review boards (IRBs) and regulatory agencies.
Transparency: Scientific research is published in journals that are accessible to other scientists and the public. This transparency allows for independent verification and critique of the research.
Dissenting Opinions
Scientific Debate: While there is a strong consensus on the safety and efficacy of vaccines, there can be legitimate scientific debates and discussions about specific aspects of vaccine research and public health policies. These debates are part of the scientific process and contribute to the advancement of knowledge.
Minority Views: There are always a small number of scientists who may hold minority views. However, these views are typically not based on the same level of evidence or rigor as the consensus position. The scientific community values evidence and data, and consensus is reached through a process of critical evaluation and peer review.
Addressing Concerns
Public Engagement: Public health organizations and scientific communities actively engage with the public to address concerns and provide clear, evidence-based information.
Education: Educating the public about the scientific method and the process of scientific research can help build trust and understanding.
Examples of Consensus
Vaccines and Public Health: The World Health Organization (WHO), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and other major health organizations consistently support the use of vaccines based on extensive scientific evidence.
Epidemiological Data: Large-scale epidemiological studies have consistently shown the effectiveness of vaccines in preventing diseases and reducing mortality rates.
Conclusion
While it is important to critically evaluate scientific information, the idea that the entire body of scientific research on viruses and vaccines is a fiction for population control is not supported by evidence. The scientific community is dedicated to advancing knowledge and improving public health through rigorous research and transparent communication.
If you have specific concerns or questions, it is always a good idea to consult credible sources and healthcare professionals who can provide evidence-based information and guidance.
AI-generated answer. Please verify critical facts.
Blackmail by world wide Intelligence Agencies would be able to force Scientific Concensus on the Vaccine/Virus Fiction wouldn't they?
The idea that worldwide intelligence agencies could orchestrate a coordinated effort to force scientific consensus on the safety and efficacy of vaccines and the existence of viruses is a complex and highly speculative theory. Here are several points to consider that address the feasibility and likelihood of such a scenario:
-
Diverse and Independent Scientific Community
Global Diversity: The scientific community is global and includes researchers from many different countries, institutions, and backgrounds. This diversity makes it extremely difficult for any single entity or group to exert uniform control over scientific consensus.
Independent Research: Many scientists work independently and often compete with each other. This competition fosters a robust and critical evaluation of research findings.
-
Peer Review and Transparency
Peer Review Process: Scientific research is subject to peer review, where other experts in the field evaluate the methodology, data, and conclusions. This process helps ensure the integrity and reliability of scientific findings.
Transparency: Scientific research is published in journals that are accessible to other scientists and often to the public. This transparency allows for independent verification and critique of the research.
-
Ethical and Legal Constraints
Ethical Standards: Scientific research is governed by strict ethical standards to ensure the integrity of the research and the well-being of participants. These standards are enforced by institutional review boards (IRBs) and regulatory agencies.
Legal Protections: Whistleblower protections and legal frameworks exist to protect individuals who report unethical or illegal activities. These protections make it risky for anyone to engage in large-scale conspiracy without detection.
-
Practical Challenges
Coordination and Scale: Coordinating a global conspiracy involving thousands of scientists, healthcare professionals, and regulatory agencies would be logistically and practically challenging. The sheer number of people involved and the complexity of the scientific process make such a conspiracy highly unlikely.
Diverse Interests: Different countries and organizations have different interests and priorities. It is unlikely that all of them would align in a coordinated effort to promote a false scientific consensus.
-
Historical Precedence
Lack of Precedent: There is no historical precedent for a successful, large-scale, and long-lasting scientific conspiracy of this magnitude. Past attempts at misinformation or manipulation have generally been short-lived and exposed.
-
Scientific Evidence and Data
Empirical Evidence: The safety and efficacy of vaccines are supported by a vast body of empirical evidence, including clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and real-world data. This evidence has been replicated and verified by independent researchers.
Public Health Outcomes: The positive public health outcomes associated with vaccination, such as the eradication of smallpox and the significant reduction in cases of diseases like polio and measles, provide strong evidence for the effectiveness of vaccines.
-
Addressing Concerns
Open Dialogue: Public health organizations and scientific communities actively engage with the public to address concerns and provide clear, evidence-based information.
Education: Educating the public about the scientific method and the process of scientific research can help build trust and understanding.
Conclusion
While it is important to critically evaluate scientific information, the idea that worldwide intelligence agencies could force a scientific consensus on the safety and efficacy of vaccines and the existence of viruses is not supported by evidence. The scientific community is dedicated to advancing knowledge and improving public health through rigorous research and transparent communication. If you have specific concerns or questions, it is always a good idea to consult credible sources and healthcare professionals who can provide evidence-based information and guidance.