Some of the most liberal (corrupt) judges Biden appointed per AI

Here’s a factual, objective list of some of the most influential judges appointed by President Joe Biden who are widely regarded—based on judicial philosophy, affiliations, rulings, and expert commentary—as among the most liberal or progressive in their views. This includes federal appellate and district judges, as these appointments have long-term national influence.

🔹 Criteria Used for Selection:

Judicial record and opinions.

Public statements and affiliations.

Academic work (if applicable).

Confirmation hearing positions.

Assessments from legal scholars, major newspapers (e.g., NYT, Washington Post), and judicial trackers (e.g., SCOTUSblog, Ballotpedia, ACS, Federalist Society ratings where relevant).

⚖️ Most Liberal/Progressive Biden-Appointed Judges

1. Ketanji Brown Jackson – U.S. Supreme Court Justice

Most prominent Biden judicial appointment.

Formerly served on the D.C. Circuit.

Known for civil liberties, criminal justice reform, and expansive view of administrative power.

Repeatedly aligned with Justices Sotomayor and Kagan in liberal bloc.

Vocal critic of “originalism” as a sole interpretive method.

Advocated for constitutional rights for detainees and restrictions on executive power.

1. Dale Ho – U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of New York

Former Director of ACLU’s Voting Rights Project.

Noted progressive legal activist.

Known for aggressively defending voting rights and opposing voter ID laws.

Strong critic of gerrymandering, has written extensively on democratic erosion.

Opposed by every Republican senator at confirmation, partly due to prior rhetoric.

1. Nusrat Choudhury – U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of New York

First Muslim woman and first Bangladeshi-American federal judge.

Former legal director at ACLU of Illinois.

Vocal on issues of police reform, racial justice, and civil rights.

Her views on systemic racism and police accountability drew attention during confirmation.

Considered ideologically progressive, particularly on Fourth Amendment issues.

1. Nancy Abudu – U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Former ACLU and Southern Poverty Law Center lawyer.

Strong record on voting rights, racial discrimination, and criminal justice reform.

First Black woman on the 11th Circuit.

Opposition in Senate centered on claims of left-wing activism.

1. Myrna Pérez – U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Former Brennan Center for Justice voting rights expert.

Known for opposition to voter suppression laws and advocacy for expanding democratic participation.

Ideologically progressive, especially on election law and civil liberties.

Seen as one of the leading liberal judicial thinkers on voting rights.

1. Arianna Freeman – U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Former federal public defender.

Advocates strong due process rights, especially in criminal cases.

Opposed by GOP senators due to progressive record on criminal defense and sentencing.

1. Rachel Bloomekatz – U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Former clerk to Justice Breyer.

Worked on climate litigation and consumer protection cases.

Supported by progressive legal circles, opposed by GOP for activist ties.

Known for strong environmental and consumer rights leanings.

🧠 Summary

Name Court Known For Progressive on

Ketanji Brown Jackson U.S. Supreme Court Liberal bloc on SCOTUS Rights, admin law

Dale Ho S.D.N.Y. Voting rights activist Elections, race

Nusrat Choudhury E.D.N.Y. Civil liberties, police reform Policing, privacy

Nancy Abudu 11th Circuit Voting rights, race Civil rights

Myrna Pérez 2nd Circuit Anti-voter suppression work Elections

Arianna Freeman 3rd Circuit Defense rights, public defender Criminal law

Rachel Bloomekatz 6th Circuit Environmental and consumer law Regulation

>>23087537

🔍 How Ideologically Aligned Judges Are Supported (Legally)

It's a communist infiltration to be clear but this is what AI says:

Funding Progressive Legal Pipelines:

Biden receives input from groups like the American Constitution Society (ACS)—the left-of-center counterpart to the conservative Federalist Society.

These groups receive funding from progressive donors (e.g., Soros foundations, Ford Foundation).

They help identify and groom progressive legal talent.

No money goes to the judges directly—but the system builds a bench of ideologically aligned lawyers and scholars.

Campaign Support → Nomination Influence:

Donors to Biden's campaign (and allied PACs) often support causes like civil rights, climate policy, labor, etc.

In turn, the judges Biden nominates often reflect those values.

This is legal patronage, not bribery—it’s how every president builds their judicial legacy.

Judicial Grants and Academic Positions (after appointment):

Some federal judges later receive fellowships, book deals, or university positions from progressive institutions.

This doesn’t mean Biden funneled money—but it's part of how influence and ideology are reinforced in elite legal circles.

Example: Former judges moving into think tanks or Ivy League posts.