Anonymous ID: fc64ed June 3, 2025, 9:13 p.m. No.23120142   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0148 >>0265 >>0740

>>23120119

>there is 0% chance they were piloting these planes.

exactly.

Now Hanley and other pilot whistleblowers are trying to get DOJ, Congress, etc., to actually INVESTIGATE.

this tech not just used for 9/11, see below.

 

>>23120117

>>23120084

More from Dan Hanley

911pilots.org/evidence-of-the-hijack-of-malaysian-airways-flight-mh370-using-the-boeing-honeywell-uninterruptible-autopilot/

 

Evidence of the Hijack of Malaysian Airways Flight MH370 using the Boeing-Honeywell Uninterruptable Autopilot

66-page REPORT

 

Introduction

The aim of this research document is to prove the technology, deployment and use of the Boeing-Honeywell Uninterruptable Autopilot (BHUAP) in the hijacking of Malaysian Airlines Flight 370 in the early hours of March the 8th 2014, whilst en-route from Kuala Lumpur in Malaysia to Beijing, China. As Boeing has already admitted to such technology having been installed on its aircraft, this paper will investigate the B777 flight systems and the avionics technology supplied by Honeywell and related companies to expose the history of the BHUAP and how it operates…..

Anonymous ID: fc64ed June 3, 2025, 9:24 p.m. No.23120164   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23120158

CGI is in many ways the most logical narrative

how could a plane make a building fall down, whether piloted or remotely piloted?

still, it's worth looking into remote control of airplanes, whether for 9/11 or other plane crashes