Anonymous ID: 597e40 June 9, 2025, 6:33 p.m. No.23150834   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23150798

 

It is Constitutional. In this current instance, this is an invasion coordinated by domestic enemies participating in insurrection against the republic.

Anonymous ID: 597e40 June 9, 2025, 6:38 p.m. No.23150892   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23150843

well, I agree:

 

>hey will ALWAYS come up with some nonsense why they need to violate rights.

 

So you basically confirmed my comment "It is not that simple". Sometimes the 'excuses' put forward in court prevail.

Anonymous ID: 597e40 June 9, 2025, 6:50 p.m. No.23150983   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1000

>>23150966

 

>the courts do not have authority to decide government interests outweigh your right to free speech

 

Take a brief history lesson of the "Covid" era. The Censorship etc.

Anonymous ID: 597e40 June 9, 2025, 6:58 p.m. No.23151040   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1061

>>23151013

it depends on the intention(motive). publishing names; knowing that doing so would endanger or encourage the endangerment of lives, is not covered. Sorry, but it ain't. This is why it is case by case.