>>23149918 LB
I post new videos every day, I used those because the short is a perfect example of a cop committing a federal crime on video depriving rights and not being held accountable, the other one is because it's a good video and civil asset forfeiture is still unconstitutional and LE still do it every day.
I just5 posted this NEW video earlier. Action starts at :17
Stop crying, man up, and defend our constitution from the domestic enemy cops.
Anon we're not talking about word of mouth complaints, we're talking cops on video committing crimes and their fellow cops cover for them.
There are videos EVERYWHERE of cops committing blatant crimes.
See >>23149974
Are you trying to convince us, or yourself? I can show you more vids of cops committing blatant constitutional violations if you'd like.
So much for equal protection under the law.
What? kek
Are you just gonna throw random shit at the wall and hope it sticks? First, that's not me, second, I'm posting videos of actual law enforcement actually violating the constitution.
KMAO notice you have no actual argument, only projection.
How about I stop the thief instead of calling criminals to help me? You do know if people weren't conditioned to wait on police in an emergency society would be a hell of a lot better right?
Because you say so right? You didn't even tag me kek
Anon this is QResearch, this is VERY much what this board is about.
No you can't, you wouldn't even respond to the 44 second short because you're too much of a coward kek
Where the Spirit if the Lord is, there is liberty.
The greatest among us is our servant, that doesn't mean a tyranny who abuses people while calling themselves a servant.
*tyrant
Anon, you do realize we are a constitutional representative republic right? Our constitution protects the minority from the majority. If the whole nation voted tomorrow that you're an asshole and have no rights, our constitution would still guarantee your rights.
Would be a shame if it already was and the "agitators" and law enforcement were setup and watched.
Wait no it wouldn't.
They're peaceful protests with agitator "agents" convincing you they're riots.
6 more?
You're confusing that anon for me. Keep crying though.
You want a cookie?
>here comes mayor bass …
>shes says the protest today has been peaceful and no vandalism, yet the whole federal building is covered in grafitti, how ridiculous can you get
What, you have a problem with feds putting graffiti on a federal building?
Just make it illegal to feed them or sleep in a park, that will solve it right?
It's literally freedom of press, and the public has a right to know who their employees are.
Those who operate in darkness afraid of the light aren't the good guys.
That's not constitutional, but feel free to cry more.
True threats aren't free speech, publishing the names of public servants absolutely is.
The Supreme Court ruled long ago free speech can not be obstruction.
You seem to be under the mistaken impression that if the court said it's ok in the past it's constitutional.
It's not.
>>231508130
It literally is. They will ALWAYS come up with some nonsense why they need to violate rights.
The identities of PUBLIC SERVANTS is public information and it is free speech and freedom of press to publish it. Our rights are ABOVE government, not below.
Government does not get to decide it's interests outweigh our rights, that's exactly what the constitution prohibits.
>>23150843 (Me)
Oops, for >>23150813
It's FF's, but I agree those doing it are domestic enemies.
As for the illegals, they are literally guaranteed due process by our constitution. Q alluded to using military justice if the courts were too "clogged up" so I believe that's why some are so desperate to deny them due process.
No anon, the government doesn't have that authority. It is LITERALLY that simple.
I didn't say anything about it going one way.
Anon, the courts do not have authority to decide government interests outweigh your right to free speech, that is exactly what the constitution forbids.
In reality a bunch of cowards enforce lawless "judges" will over the will of the people, constitution, and actual law. You know, the "teachers of the law" in long robes who love the seat of honor? A lot of idiots think they have authority they don't have.
Not at all. As I originally said, publishing the names of PUBLIC SERVANTS is a RIGHT. That doesn't change just because government is lawless. Government doesn't grant our rights.
Wrong. It is LITERALLY freedom of press.
You're defending government darkness while on a research board about dark to light and returning power to the people. If you honestly believe that government can violate freedom of speech and freedom of press for "officer safety" then you are an enemy to the Constitution of the United States and We the People it represents.
They do, and they give up certain rights when on the job. Furthermore, there is no constitutional right to work for We the People anonymously without We the Peoples knowledge.