are the retards in this board thinking Trump saved the world just bots or what?
Only the most deluded Trump cultists believe Orange McCain destroyed Iran's nuclear program, or that it's possible to do so in a Top Gun-style raid
Even Israeli nationalists admit Trump's attack was a PR stunt, complimenting a leaked DIA assessment, satellite imagery and more https://t.co/HMrnkujJDJ
— Max Blumenthal (@MaxBlumenthal) June 25, 2025
Prepper News: WTF… Something Disturbing is Happening… What are They Hiding
https://youtube.com/watch?v=CVCFIcmwa9M
This is your World War 3 update. Something is off. Something isn't right. There's something weird going on
These leaks that the White House is calling them, that have in some way compromised the dissemination of information adieu with the strike on the Iranian nuclear facilities. Somehow this is a big controversy. Okay, but here is the elephant in the room that nobody is talking about.
Donald Trump is saying and Mark Rubio and Pete Hague said, they're all saying that these leaks, these intelligence leaks that supposedly contradict the official narrative that they destroyed these facilities, that they were fake news, right?
So why is it then, if this is all fake news, why is Trump seeking to limit classified info sharing with Congress after the so-called false Iranian leaks that are trying to denigrate the pilots, as they're saying. It's always about, you know, that now they're trying to say that any criticism of the adventures, the misadventures of the military-industrial conflicts are somehow criticizing the troops, that whole thing. You got to support the troops, right?
I'm telling you, they're up to something. Okay, they are up to something and something stinks with all of this.
And approaching issues like this, where they're doing so much damage control, do you notice that? Every single one of them, Hegseth, Gabbard, Levitt, Rubio, they're all coming out of the woodwork and saying, no, no, no, no, this is the case, we just completely destroyed that place, right?
Now, I have a theory as to what's going on here.
I think they have much bigger plans for this war in Iran. And for starters, if it didn't work, I want you to consider what they just committed to. And we got to talk about some Trump tweets and things of that nature as well, that are just completely unhinged.
Anyways, so consider that this misadventure of the U.S. military-industrial complex required seven B-2A Spirit long-range stealth bombers, 14 massive ordnance penetrators, which is probably the bulk of those conventional munitions that are at the disposal of the United States military, because they only had a couple dozen to start. A couple dozen in the entire arsenal. These are 30,000 pound bombs. Now, those seven bombers were accompanied by F-22 Raptors, F-35s, and 52 aerial refueling tankers for one mission. So do the math on how much that one mission would have cost the American taxpayer to save somebody over there in the Middle East, we're told, right?
Now, the tweet that Trump made today, I can't even make heads or tails of it.
Get a load of what Trump said today. BREAKING NEWS, Trump said. In caps. And then he decides not to use caps for once:
"I was shocked to hear that the State of Israel, which has just had one of its greatest moments in history, is strongly led by Bibi Netanyahu, is continuing its ridiculous witch hunt against their great wartime Prime Minister. Bibi and I just went through hell together. Really. I wonder if it's as hellish as the conditions in the Gaza Strip. Anyways, I digress. Fighting a very tough and brilliant longtime enemy of Israel, Iran. And Bibi could not have been better, sharper, or stronger in his love for the incredible Holy Land. I will say that Bibi has had a lot of success on the war front from their point of view. Anybody else would have suffered losses, embarrassment, and chaos. Bibi Netanyahu was a warrior like perhaps no other warrior in the history of Israel."
Almost as if this guy has some dirt on this guy. You know what I'm saying?
"And the result was something that nobody thought was possible. A complete elimination, get this, of potentially one of the biggest and most powerful nuclear weapons anywhere in the world. And it was going to happen soon."
Wait a minute. What did he just say?
That's not a typo. That was clear as day. A complete elimination of potentially one of the biggest and most powerful, so we use that qualifier, nuclear weapons anywhere in the world.
You can't even find a way that, okay, maybe you could say he was trying to say nuclear programs, but Iran didn't have the biggest and most powerful nuclear program.
Did he meant to say threats? One of the biggest and most powerful nuclear threats anywhere in the world? Most powerful nuclear threats? Russia has 5,000 nukes. What about the North Koreans?
What is he trying to say here? Something weird is going on with all of this. It just makes no sense.
I was talking to Ray McGovern today. We're going to release that video tomorrow.
And I asked Ray, who was a CIA analyst for 30 years, and he was the guy who briefed Ronald Reagan every day. And I asked him, is it possible, at all possible, technically possible, scientifically, physically possible, that while those bombers were making their way back, that they could have in any way determined that it was a successful campaign and that that facility was destroyed?
And he said, not a chance. And now I'm pretty sure anybody with common sense could come to the same conclusion. But this seems like there's something weird, like there's weird messaging. Is there some kind of cryptic language trying to be communicated here?
So is he insinuating that the Iranians had a massive nuclear weapon that they were going to use to drop on Tel Aviv or Haifa? Is that what's being implied here? Because that's a pretty big accusation to just flippantly fire off there into the universe.
Didn't I just tell you guys that that was all stagecraft and theater and that these guys are best of friends behind the scenes?
But he had to say that to make it look. Because this whole thing is all about baiting the Iranians into a false sense of security so that they can restart the show once again. Mark my words. And McGovern issued a tweet the other day that warned of a false flag on a aircraft carrier. Something that has happened in the past, and it involved Israel and the United States. So you don't think that can't happen again? History that fought harder and more competently than Benjamin Netanyahu.
Okay, now the supposed leak, right, that they keep going on about, they were all doing damage control today. Tulsi Gabbard, Pete Hegg says, no, no, this thing was a total success. Why are they saying that? Because it's all part of the plan. You need the Iranians to let their guards down.
You need the Iranians to believe that you actually think that their nuclear program was destroyed. But the Iranians aren't buying it. They voted in Parliament to abandon the non-proliferation treaty. Okay, now it only needs to be ratified by the National Security Council. Yesterday, when I reported on it, they basically brought it up as a talking point that they might be getting out, or they proposed it. The legislation has passed. It just needs final approval by essentially the supreme leader, as we call him here in the West, the Ayatollah and the National Security Council, who, of course, is closely connected with that.
Now, interestingly, they're saying that the leak involved details from a classified defense intelligence agency. Battle damage assessment that was reportedly shared with CNN, Fox, NBC, and the New York Times. Okay, now if this information was classified and accurate, and it showed that there was no damage done that was sufficient, because what you're not hearing is the IAEA chief, Rafael Grossi himself, he claimed that the actual facility, okay, where the part of the subterranean bunker that holds the actual centrifuges is actually closer to 800 meters deep, or 6 to 800, because depending on which, you know, part of the mountain you're on, you're going to be at a different elevation.
So in addition to the 90 meters, there's actually 500 meters on top of that. So there's no way, they're trying to make up this argument that, and I have all of the technicals that I can share with you with respect to how they're trying to explain it, and they're probably going to do this at the Pentagon press conference tomorrow. They're going to try to bamboozle people with a bunch of bullshit and jargon that most people won't understand.
Okay, possibly is the key word there. So why are they all just piling in to make the claim resolutely that this worked and that it was an unequivocal success? How is it possible that they knew that, and who are they trying to fool? They know that this damage probably was not critical for the facility. They know that the Iranians still have nuclear material. They're trying to regroup, recalibrate, and get ready to recommence hostilities in the near future. I think they have something planned.'''
Okay. Pete Hegseth said, we obliterated Iran's nuclear sites. They claim that the nuclear program was set back years. Now, if you're the Iranians, are you going to debate this? You're going to be like, oh, they actually believe this, right? But the problem is they're selling it too hard. Look, this isn't even a very elaborate scam. It's only thinking a few moves ahead. These people are very Machiavellian in their machinations. They're good liars, and they know how to put on a show. And right now they're trying to fool the Iranians into thinking that they believe that the Iranian nuclear program is done, when they know full well that it isn't, and that they're going to go back in to try to finish the job at some point in the future. Not that nuclear weapons are the biggest concern of these people. Yes, it is a concern, but it's primarily the resistant regime. Because even if Iran gets a nuclear weapon, the likelihood that they would use it and then essentially create the conditions for their total destruction is very low.
President Trump declared that the nuclear program was destroyed, obliterated, says that they'll never be attempt, they'll never will be another attempt to build nuclear weapons, they claim. Did they do some kind of back-channel deal? We really don't know, because everything that the Iranians are doing right now is telegraphing otherwise, abandoning the non-proliferation treaty, disallowing the International Atomic Energy Agency to come in and inspect these facilities, right? So, if this was true, then they wouldn't be doing all these things. So, something weird is happening behind the scenes. Now, it could just be, and I just thought about this, if the Russians and the Iranians now have some unwritten pact, and Washington knows it, that if they attack you again, we're going to come to your assistance. That could be what caused them to put the brakes on this, and not only that, China as well, but it could be that this is the Day X that we talk about.
And the reason why I know this is because I follow a lot of accounts which are, some of the accounts are being retweeted by Trump, like the one Israeli open source Intel account that tweeted out Fordow is gone, and then Trump retweeted that. These guys, as well as a handful of others, have been all tweeting in unison, yep, the war's over, you know, case closed, mission accomplished.
And it's like, wait a minute, you're being a little too obvious about this, you know what I mean?
Why is Donald Trump posting, and he literally posted this today, the parody of Barbaran. You guys have all heard the Bomb Iran song. This is from way, way back in the day, probably back in like after the Iraq war that was created. It's a spinoff of Barbaran, Barbara Ann from the Beach Boys, Bomb Iran. And he posted that. And it just, it's inconsistent, right, with what we're hearing. It's completely inconsistent.
I can attest to the fact that there's no way to know if these facilities are destroyed. Israeli media admits Fordow can only be destroyed from within.