https://x.com/rt_com/status/1938332149217644577?s=46
https://x.com/rt_com/status/1938420613217194355?s=46
s Giorgia Meloni okay?
Did she party too hard with Zelensky in The Hague?
Is there specific example of Jennifer Griffin being the worst. I thought I was the only one who hated her, but I found out that every other person does too.
Grok’s answer
Critics of Jennifer Griffin, particularly those aligned with pro-Trump or conservative viewpoints, have labeled her a "hack" for several reasons based on their perceptions of her reporting. Here are examples they cite, drawn from critical posts and commentary:
-
Alleged Misrepresentation of Trump’s Statements: Critics, including former Fox News colleague Pete Hegseth, have accused Griffin of intentionally misrepresenting President Donald Trump’s statements. During a 2025 Pentagon briefing, Hegseth called her “about the worst” for her reporting on U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, suggesting she distorted the administration’s claims about the strikes’ success. Critics argue her questions, like those about the movement of highly enriched uranium, were framed to undermine Trump’s narrative.
-
Confirming Controversial Stories with Anonymous Sources: In 2020, Griffin confirmed parts of an Atlantic story alleging Trump disparaged veterans and fallen soldiers, calling them “losers” and “suckers.” Critics, including Trump supporters, slammed her for relying on anonymous sources, claiming this lent credibility to what they call a “hoax” or “fake news.” They argue her reporting cost Trump votes and was part of a broader anti-Trump agenda.
-
Defending Biden Administration Policies: In 2023, Griffin was criticized for her reporting on the $6 billion in unfrozen Iranian funds, which she said was held in a secure Qatar account. Critics argued she downplayed Iran’s ability to use these funds indirectly for terrorism, calling her explanation a “red herring” and accusing her of pushing Biden administration talking points.
-
Perceived Bias in Ukraine Coverage: Some critics, including former Fox News host Tucker Carlson, have called Griffin a “shill” for the Pentagon or “deep state.” They point to her fact-checking of colleagues during Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022, where she corrected claims about U.S.-funded biolabs, as evidence of her aligning with establishment narratives rather than questioning them.
-
Reporting on Sensitive Military Issues: Critics have taken issue with Griffin’s coverage of military operations, such as her 2025 report alleging Hegseth texted classified information via Signal, potentially endangering U.S. forces in Yemen. They argue such reports exaggerate or fabricate issues to damage Trump’s administration.
-
Perceived Anti-Trump Slant: Some X users and commentators, like Clayton Morris, have labeled Griffin a “left-wing TDS [Trump Derangement Syndrome] hack” who takes every opportunity to criticize Trump. They cite instances like her noting that some U.S. pilots were women when Hegseth referred to them as “boys,” framing it as her injecting unnecessary political correctness.
These criticisms often portray Griffin as a biased reporter who prioritizes anti-Trump narratives, relies on questionable sources, or serves as a mouthpiece for establishment or liberal interests, according to her detractors.
Grok is good for summarizing other people’s digs