TYB !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Nigga , I use to filter your shit, but now, it's fucking hilarious, thanks again for another installment
You're gay?
>>23266298
Love some night shift in the middle of the Day
Oh, you're a girl, Rules of the Internet and all, my apologies
I think this one has the reefer madness
If a man on the street was getting his ass whooped, which man is the aggressor?
Who instigated it
Yes, it is a serious question. If I come around a corner and a man has another man pinned down, bashing his head with a brick, and give aid that may result in injury or death to the party, I need to know. If I shoot the guy with the brick, just to have the poor guy on the bottom exclaim, "thanks Man, He caught me with his Kid and flipped out", then it matters
Key aspects of the instigator rule:
Loss of self-defense right: If someone starts a fight (i.e., is the aggressor or instigator), they may forfeit their right to claim self-defense if they get injured during the fight.
Defining an aggressor/instigator: An aggressor is someone who initiates, provokes, or continues an altercation, according to the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals. Examples of instigating behavior include throwing the first punch, using verbal threats or invitations to a fight, or physically trying to start a fight with someone who doesn't want to engage.
Exceptions and nuances:
Escalation: In some cases, even if someone starts a fight, they may still be entitled to use self-defense if the other party escalates the level of conflict to a greater degree of force.
Withdrawal: An initial aggressor who withdraws in good faith and clearly communicates their desire to end the confrontation may regain the right to self-defense if the other party continues to use force.
Jurisdiction-specific rules: The application and specifics of the instigator rule can vary depending on the specific jurisdiction and its self-defense laws.
Important Considerations:
Proportionality: Even if self-defense is justified, the amount of force used must be proportional to the threat faced. Using excessive force can negate a self-defense claim.
Reasonable belief: To justify the use of force in self-defense, a person must have a reasonable belief that the force was necessary to prevent imminent harm.
Note: Self-defense laws, including the instigator rule and its exceptions, can be complex and are highly dependent on the specific facts of a case and the laws of the relevant jurisdiction.
I have taught self defense and CCW for almost 30 years Faggot
That's why its important to listen to those folks who have had experience, but shills be shillin'
There are only seconds to spare and a lifetime of monday night quarter backing, I am a Man who does what needs done in the moment, I am a product of my society, and do actually belong to a community identified as a tribe
Then you have put the hours necessary into your awareness and security, those around you will never see the blessing of your presence, but God sees all and has given you eyes to see, a mind to deal with evil, and Grace to know that you are a Strong Man
You dont know what Ive done, seen, and survived. But I understand .
So, you're problem is complicity, dont be complici
There is your mistake, you judge your moral compass against another's….
Well then, go get your shit done Son, be that man of action, see you on the news
Naw, I aint mad , that would imply I care , you don't bother me