>>23295738

Who say's that they are "Anons"; ever hear of a thing called "Consensus Cracking"?

>>23295764

and you have no evidence to support that those "switching loyalty" are true anons. Have a good day

>>23295778

Good for you, now please if you would, educate us and share with the rest of the class.

>>23295784

Yeah, the "one post then ip hop" comes off to me as suspect, I usually just lurk, but, meh

>>23295844

Nah, that's just Mitch, figured it out after one of his replies to me…… I replied to a shill……