Anonymous ID: f0bb0c July 10, 2025, 11:39 a.m. No.23306433   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23306416

Pretty sure no one believes the little muppet that looks for attention by imitating how someone else memes to destroy the person he imitates. You're just an NPC. The namefag Anjel always bragged about going to the gym too. You're just not as good as who you imitate, and I'm not speaking to the sockpuppet on that ID, I'm speaking to the clown piece of shit at the keyboard that handles that ID and persona.

Anonymous ID: f0bb0c July 10, 2025, 11:46 a.m. No.23306468   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23306444

You know, I still liked that movie. It'd be nice to see all the shades of lanterns in a DC movie one day. My tastes have always partial to the Blue Lanterns, drawing from hope rather than willpower like the Greens.

Anonymous ID: f0bb0c July 10, 2025, 12:15 p.m. No.23306635   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6648

>>23306516

You post copypastas of what I've written and put trademark symbols on what I've posted. Who's the one's who're really looking for fame to grift off the reputation of someone else?

Anonymous ID: f0bb0c July 10, 2025, 12:17 p.m. No.23306650   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6661

>>23306641

Weird how the person making those accusations is the one that displays that personality flaw. Did you really think the imitations would destroy or make someone comply with how you want them to behave in order to protect yourselves and your anonymous herd control mechanism you clowns have cultivated over decades online?

Anonymous ID: f0bb0c July 10, 2025, 12:20 p.m. No.23306660   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6686

>>23306656

No, you're just the loser that doesn't know what to do but imitate someone else with the same underlying pattern as the MuhJoo script, only with a different coat of paint. Instead of accusing a religious group of the behavior, you're actually using the behavior on one individual here. Bet you muppets wish you never blew the banhammer ammo early in 2021 and ruined any chance you might have today back then.

Anonymous ID: f0bb0c July 10, 2025, 12:29 p.m. No.23306729   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6733 >>6738

You gotta remember, the board was only given 40% of the picture, so acting like you have 100% of the picture and then whining why shit isn't happening is pretty damn disingenuous.

Anonymous ID: f0bb0c July 10, 2025, 12:52 p.m. No.23306851   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6922

You know how you can throw a spending bill PDF into an AI and it'll spit out a couple page breakdown of all the major points in it without someone having to read the full 1000 pages or more? Is a government AI advanced enough to go through, say, 10,000 hours of videos and flag suspicious moments for a person to pull up and examine the videos at those timestamps? Only ask because of those AI voiceover play-by-plays of movie clips or video shorts on YouTube, seems like those are able to examine a scene and give a mostly accurate description, though sometimes it's off by a bit.