Anonymous ID: 5a8b1e July 24, 2025, 1:56 p.m. No.23375862   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23375823

Corrupt, criminal douche bags are easy to identify by their overuse of the phrase, "It wasn't me, it was those dirty constitution loving, non-criminal, AMERICANS.

 

 

KEK.

Anonymous ID: 5a8b1e July 24, 2025, 2:10 p.m. No.23375953   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5972

>>23375870

Think of the misery that organization has cause for decades. How much poverty has it inflicted on the regular, "non-ruling class" of people.

 

Article I, Section 8, Clause 4:

 

[The Congress shall have Power . . . ] To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States; . . .

 

The concept of naturalization typically concerns the grant of citizenship to a person who has lived in the United States for a specified time period and meets certain other requirements; to groups of people in newly-acquired territories who acquire citizenship by statute or treaty; and to children born outside the United States who become U.S. citizens upon birth to a U.S. citizen parent, or who derive their citizenship upon their parents’ naturalization in the United States. Congress has also addressed the concept of denaturalization, which refers to the revocation of citizenship from a naturalized U.S. citizen.

 

Congress’s power over denaturalization derives from its power "[t]o establish an uniform rule of naturalization," and from its power "to make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or any Department or Officer thereof."1 In describing the theory of denaturalization, the Supreme Court has stated that "[a]n alien has no moral nor constitutional right to retain the privileges of citizenship if, by false evidence or the like, an imposition has been practiced upon the court, without which the certificate of citizenship could not and would not have been issued."2 Thus, "there must be strict compliance with all the congressionally imposed prerequisites to the acquisition of citizenship. Failure to comply with any of these conditions renders the certificate of citizenship ‘illegally procured,’ and naturalization that is unlawfully procured can be set aside."3

 

The Naturalization Act of 1906 was the first law to provide for denaturalization.4 It authorized judicial proceedings against a naturalized U.S. citizen "for the purpose of setting aside and canceling the certificate of citizenship on the ground of fraud or on the ground that such certificate of citizenship was illegally procured."5 The Act provided that if a naturalized U.S. citizen returned to his native country or went to another foreign country and established a permanent residence there within five years of being admitted as a U.S. citizen, such facts were "prima facie evidence" that he or she lacked the intention to become a permanent citizen of the United States at the time of filing the naturalization application.6 Absent "countervailing evidence," the naturalized citizen’s permanent residence in the foreign country would "be sufficient in the proper proceeding to authorize the cancelation of his certificate of citizenship as fraudulent, . . ."

Anonymous ID: 5a8b1e July 24, 2025, 2:20 p.m. No.23376010   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6033

>>23375905

Turn it into a museum to remind Americans to keep their heads outta their asses and NEVER let go of OUR right to use the currency that allows us to keep our wealth in our own hands, and not some interest charging shit bag who will try to use it to control or destroy us. The ancients weren't stupid.