And when you look at those types of crimes, OK, maybe they leaked this information, but was there motive and intent to subvert the government of the United States or a standing president or a president that was coming in to office?
If that's the case, then the the statute of limitations goes out the door, and that's why I believe. It's important for them to go forward on a RICO case because as they link all of these individuals and they can show whether the statute of limitations for those particular crimes have gone, right? Let's say they've passed, but they can show that 2 or more people were involved in these crimes for the purpose of furthering their criminal enterprise. That's a RICO charge.
And so when you can show all these people were doing this and the purpose for which they were doing it, if that leads to things like treason, insurrection, subversion, then, then we are in territory we've never been before and the statute of limitations, I don't believe will apply because it's it it supersedes what the actual crime was and it goes over to the furtherance of a criminal enterprise for the purpose of subversion. Or treason or so on and so forth.