No need.
We have all that we need.
Re-Read the drops.
Use a [15] minute delta around the Q-Clock.
Count all the [markers].
Yes, who are we?
Correct.
https://euintelligence.com/big-players/israel-created-hamas/
"The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is marked by complexity and nuance, encompassing various actors, ideologies, and historical events. Among the key players is Hamas, a Palestinian militant group infamous for its acts of terror against Israeli civilians and leaders. While Hamas officially emerged in 1987 during the first Palestinian Intifada, its roots can be traced back to the Muslim Brotherhood movement in Egypt. This article aims to delve into lesser-known aspects of Hamas’ origins, exploring historical evidence and statements that suggest a relationship between Israel and Hamas during its formative years.
Hamas: A Product of Historical Context:
Hamas, an acronym for an Arabic phrase meaning Islamic Resistance Movement, was officially established in 1987. However, its origins lie in Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood movement, reflecting a broader ideological and political context. The Muslim Brotherhood provided a foundational ideology for Hamas, shaping its goals and approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
The Israeli Dimension: Contacts and Strategic Calculations:
During the 1980s, the Israeli military and intelligence were engaged in strategic calculations concerning the Palestinian territories, particularly Gaza. This era saw the Israeli establishment maintain contacts with various Islamic activists, including those affiliated with Hamas. The objective was to create a counterbalance to the dominant secularists and leftists associated with the Palestine Liberation Organization and the Fatah party.
Israeli Support for Hamas: A Strategic Move:
Eminent former Israeli officials, such as Brig. Gen. Yitzhak Segev and Avner Cohen, have openly acknowledged Israel’s financial and logistical support for the Palestinian Islamist movement. The Israeli backing of Hamas aimed to strategically counterbalance the dominance of secularist and leftist factions within the Palestinian political landscape. Avner Cohen, for instance, cautioned against a divide-and-rule approach and advised against favoring Palestinian Islamists over their secular counterparts.
Hamas’ Evolution and Acknowledging Unintended Consequences:
Despite the initial strategic support, Hamas evolved into a formidable militant force with its distinct agenda and objectives. Avner Cohen’s admission, “Hamas, to my great regret, is Israel’s creation,” highlights the unintended consequences of Israel’s strategic calculations. Over time, Hamas transformed into an independent and powerful entity, impacting the dynamics of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in unforeseen ways.
Examining the historical links between Israel and Hamas provides valuable insights into the complex narrative of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Understanding the origins and evolution of Hamas, along with its connection to Israeli support, is crucial for a comprehensive analysis of the ongoing struggle. Acknowledging historical realities fosters informed discussions and potentially contributes to a peaceful resolution, envisioning a better future for both Palestinians and Israelis. The current focus should pivot towards peace, reconciliation, and sustainable coexistence, aiming to break the cycle of violence and pave the way for a lasting resolution."
Hamas is a creation of Israel.
https://www.analystnews.org/posts/how-israel-helped-prop-up-hamas-for-decades
"We know that the Palestinian militant group Hamas is responsible for the deadliest attack on Israeli soil in recent history, killing over 1,300 people and taking more than 200 hostages. Founded in occupied Gaza in 1987, Hamas — an acronym for Harakat al-Muqawama al-Islamiya (Islamic Resistance Movement) — is the armed group that holds political control over Gaza today.
What you might not know is that this same group was actually created in part by Israel itself. While it may sound like a conspiracy theory, it’s actually a well-documented, open secret that Israel has helped finance and prop up Hamas for years.
“We need to tell the truth,” Israeli major general Gershon Hacohen, an associate of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, said in a 2019 TV interview. “Netanyahu’s strategy is to prevent the option of two states, so he is turning Hamas into his closest partner. Openly Hamas is an enemy. Covertly, it’s an ally.”
Understanding Israel’s strategy in doing so can help us read through the lines of the Israeli government’s rhetoric on Hamas’s barbarism. It also helps illuminate Netanyahu’s vision for the region — and his ultimate endgame.
Want just the highlights? Check out our video shorts: part 1, part 2.
Israel’s strategy of divide and conquer
“Hamas, to my great regret, is Israel’s creation.”
So says Avner Cohen, Israel’s head of religious affairs in Gaza at the time of Hamas’s emergence, in a 2009 Wall Street Journal article called “How Israel Helped to Spawn Hamas.”
Hamas was born during the first Intifada, when Palestinians rose up against their occupiers beginning in 1987. The group was founded by Sheikh Ahmad Yassin, a near-blind quadriplegic refugee who grew up in a Gaza refugee camp.
There, Yassin had helped form a Palestinian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, the infamous and influential movement founded in Egypt that espoused a political Islam — sometimes called “Islamism.” He established this Gaza-based group — Mujama al-Islamiya, a precursor to Hamas — in 1973 as a Muslim charity that set up a university, library, mosques and schools.
Yassin and his fledgling movement found an unexpected ally in Israeli authorities. Gaza’s new rulers loosened previous restrictions on activists promoting political Islam; officially registered Mujama al-Islamiya as a charity and later as an association; allowed its members to spread its message and build goodwill by developing a network of local institutions; and stood back when the group battled its rivals: Palestine’s secularists.
“Anyone who wants to thwart the establishment of a Palestinian state has to support bolstering Hamas and transferring money to Hamas. This is part of our strategy — to isolate the Palestinians in Gaza from the Palestinians in the West Bank.”
"After Israel invaded and captured the Gaza Strip from Egypt in the 1960s, Israel’s government had been eager to weaken the leading Palestinian political force. At the time, that was the secularist nationalist Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) and its leading figure, Yasser Arafat of the Fatah party.
Israel predictably went after PLO members, many of whom were violently anti-Israel. Meanwhile, honoring the tried-and-true colonial strategy of divide and rule, Israel also began enabling Yassin’s nascent group in the late ’70s.
This religious political movement at the time was on the fringes of Palestinian politics. But with funding from Israel, its influence grew and it eventually morphed into Hamas as we know it today.
It’s a classic case of blowback. “Israel’s experience echoes that of the U.S., which, during the Cold War, looked to Islamists as a useful ally against communism,” the Wall Street Journal wrote nearly 15 years ago. “Anti-Soviet forces backed by America after Moscow’s 1979 invasion of Afghanistan later mutated into al Qaeda.”
Indeed, by the 1990s, the PLO had begun working toward a two-state compromise, and Hamas in Gaza had clearly become a powerful anti-Israel militant force that had earned significant support from the Palestinian people. Israel began trying to crack down on the monster it had helped create — but it was too late.
Keeping Hamas alive — and a two-state solution dead
For decades, Israel has hammered Hamas in Gaza — regular airstrike campaigns, targeted assassinations, a decades-long blockade — with its efforts often backfiring by strengthening support for the group.
But even more sinister is the way that Israeli authorities have, to this day, continued to deliberately enable Hamas."
More at link.
Would Israel want constant conflict?
Is conflict profitable?
How would you ensure that the Palestinians are never united?
Have you heard of the Lavon Affair?
:40 starts with 11/17 2017. No drops on that date.
All the Q-Clock is, is a calendar wrapped around a clock face.
>>23493067
Hmmm
Yes. Nov 12 2017 is drops #142-149.
It is on the :35 mark. [5] back from :40 and [10] ahead of :25.
Each step out in the spiral is only 60 days ahead.
For Luck.