>>23509555 (lb)
Jim, can u give BV "dart" computer aids? He's a shill.
>>23509555 (lb)
Jim, can u give BV "dart" computer aids? He's a shill.
Just realized something. The sperm and ovum that were stored in labs pre-2020 are the only human gametes that havn't been effected by Covid-19.
They may be the future that civization is dependant on for survival.
except the EO doesnt say what YOU believe. it states to use the act as a predicate to charge ancillary crimes. nice try antifa(ggot)
burn the ISIS flag above your mom's headboard
Arson is a crime. Cant have open flames randomly in public. Burn your trash in the street and see if "muh 1st amendment" stops YOU from being jailbate
It is and past bread notables have instances of arrests and fines.
Its not MY logic its LOGIC.
Except thats not the EO. Read it and weep moshe.
Yelling Fire is free speech too and SCOTUS already deemd it unprotected in certain circumstances. Just like YOUr faggotry.
Highlight the line in the EO that violates the law
Literally this.
https:// www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/08/prosecuting-burning-of-the-american-flag/
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered:
Notice it doesnt say "by council of shill anon" but rather by the power vested in POTUS?
Inciting a riot, disturbing the peace, arson, blocking right of way, unlawful demonstration, etc
House, Senate, White House, and SCOTUS not mention 27 governors.
I hear its warm in the oven
Your mother is loose. You listed controlled not open flames. Congrats on proving you never read a law or been arrested. How many people have been arreated in Cali and Oregon for fires?
If YOU were right the number would be 0.
Muh free speech left the chat when Biden mandated masks, vax cards (over top of religious rights), and shut down sm. Meanwhile the same Colorado trannies that are here crying "muh free speeches" tried to force unironic Bakers and wedding planners to use their speech against their own beliefs. And the state lost when SCOTUS slapped them down 3 seperate times.
No i am not confused. The STATE (ie Govt) tried to compel the speech. That was the problem. This EO doesnt compel speech at all, it specifically compels ACTIONS. Its a fucking masterpeice and includes severances clauses.it is IRONCLAD.