tyb
>>23510859 lb
She says "No"
Figures.
They might all get swooped up at once.
Provisions for one week or two.
Stay inside?
>>23511640 lb
>>23511644 lb
>>23511647 lb
tyb
>>23510859 lb
She says "No"
Figures.
They might all get swooped up at once.
Provisions for one week or two.
Stay inside?
>>23511640 lb
>>23511644 lb
>>23511647 lb
>>23512137
think of this
For the attack of Sept 11 2001 the Networks over-road the local affiliate channels and ran their own Military feed.
they used FCS
In the context of military integration of warfare, FCS stands for Future Combat Systems. It was a major U.S. Army modernization program aimed at creating a networked, integrated system of advanced technologies, including manned and unmanned vehicles, sensors, and weapons, designed to enhance situational awareness, lethality, and survivability. The program emphasized interconnected systems for joint warfare, leveraging real-time data sharing and automation to improve battlefield coordination. While FCS was largely canceled in 2009, its concepts influenced subsequent military modernization efforts.
and the major networks overrode the local network feeds.
How does this relate to Trump's call to cancel the Propaganda network's licenses?
(yesterday or the day before that "thought" of his was published)
Yes, President Donald Trump has specifically mentioned broadcast licenses in his recent statements about networks and the FCC. In posts over the past couple of days (as of August 26, 2025), he called for the FCC to revoke the licenses of networks like ABC and NBC, citing what he described as "unfair" or overwhelmingly negative coverage of him (e.g., claiming it was "97%" negative). He also questioned why networks aren't paying "millions of dollars" in license fees and suggested that licenses should be revoked or bid out to others.
These comments echo similar threats he's made in the past, such as in 2017 (targeting NBC) and as recently as October 2024 (regarding CBS and 60 Minutes), where he argued that corrupt networks should lose their licenses and have them auctioned off.
It's worth noting that the FCC regulates and licenses individual broadcast stations (affiliates), not the networks themselves, which limits the practical impact of such calls—though they can still pressure companies during mergers or other regulatory reviews.
Regarding Truth Social specifically, my direct check of his profile didn't turn up posts from the last week explicitly mentioning these topics, but news outlets attribute the latest remarks to late-night social media activity, which is consistent with his posting habits on that platform.
The main Network have it arranged it, fairly recently per historical timeline, to not have to have a license for broadcast - and claim private ownership of their Networks,, even though the "air waves" were named to be held in the public Trust - assets to be used to the benefit of the public (not for warfare against them/us)
It's the local channels which hold the licenses:
Think of this; local channels are "off the hook" for TV Fakery, their licenses are not in jeopardy, since they were overridden by the Military controlled major networks on Sept. 11th 2001.
Local channels nationwide were seized for the "emergency"
Didn't the would-be dominators use the same trick with stolen election, Biden laptop, russia russia?
They lack liability since they are working under orders from the government?
Neat, Nice or Foolish Trick?
Think of this; "knowledge" and "information" was designated a strategic asset, related to national security. So if a person wrote something against the corrupt government or revealing their projects (they see themselves as "the government" as Lisa Page confirmed "It's our government" ) you are labeled a "terrorist" and a danger to society.
The governments been holding back all kind of information under the pretense "it could be used by the enemy"
starting with Atomic Energy.
All physics and engineering is monitored since it could result (their pretense) in the creation of an Atom Bomb.
From there, in the 50's, it led to the hobbling of all information? Turning all information into "infotainment" i.e. Propaganda.
cf. creation of CNN
At the beginning of Russia Russia the government claimed all voting equipment was essential for national security, and then classified all information relating to it, as a National Security issue.
If you post questions about their methods you are a "national security risk"
"Can't get an answer for "Were the restrictions (on info, dissemination and research) limited to "nuclear physics" !"
could this be why Q's information dissemination project grows out of the ENERGY dept?
"Energy" was in charge of suppression of knowledge,
>>23512243
>Connects
Also in charge of Alien contact info as well.
cf Majestic-12
sauce Thread
https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1956745993439125836
"Hey @grok
, my sarcastic physicist colleagues are lecturing me again. Maybe I’m a big dumb-dumb, but I seem to remember something about John Aristotle Phillips’ undergraduate work under Freeman Dyson in 1976 at Princeton.
Was physics secrecy really confined to the 1940s & 1950s?"
Military took over information systems at least as far back as Sept. 11th 2001.
The Media is used as a weapon = FakeNews.
I think it's cool.
Need to brush up on what de Toqueville and Santayana said about American character.
vs. European and rest of world.
Americans are cool.
People are poisoned by the appropriation of European values.
As Americans we have our own values.
Slightly topical at the moment of the Great Revitalization of the American experience.
Didn't people know that, many years ago already.
Pathetic losers in charge of warfare;
and pop culture.
Is n't "Overton Window" relevant to Q research though?
Why is it on a banned Leftist vocabulary list?
When these were in power and taking us down, stealing and lying, under color of law; I 'd have a better time accepting a flag burning,
MAYBE?
But now, With our Country being cleaned, there's no excuse.
I heard "burning the flag" was legal per Constitution, but the man who burned it in D.C was arrested for the fire, not for what he was burning?