Anonymous ID: e8ce56 Aug. 26, 2025, 9:19 p.m. No.23514046   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4100

Here are 10 cities with the highest crime rates

 

Memphis, Tenn.: 2,501 violent crimes per 100,000 people

Detroit: 1,781 per 100,00 and a rate of 31.2 homicides per 100,000 residents

Baltimore: 1,606 violent crimes and 34.8 homicides per 100,000 people last year

Kansas City, Mo.: 1,547 violent offenses per 100,000 people in 2024

Milwaukee: 1,431 violent crimes per 100,000

Albuquerque, NM: 1,182 violent crimes occurred per 100,000

Houston: 1,148 crimes per 100,000 people last year

Nashville, Tenn.: 1,124 violent crimes per 100,000 people

Denver: 993 violent crimes per 100,000 people

Washington, DC: 926 per 100,000 in the nation’s capital

 

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5470828-fbi-data-violent-crime-cities/amp/

Anonymous ID: e8ce56 Aug. 26, 2025, 9:20 p.m. No.23514048   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4100

John Bolton cashed in and America paid the price

 

I went to prison for defending the Constitutional separation of powers.

 

John Bolton (an occasional contributor to The Hill) may well wind up in prison, too if investigators uncover evidence and prosecutors decide to bring charges over his alleged classified disclosures.

 

When Bolton wrote his book, “The Room Where It Happened” — reportedly receiving a $2 million advance — he wasn’t just dishing gossip. He was sharing information about Oval Office conversations and national security that should have stayed secret — either by law or under executive privilege.

 

A federal judge already spelled this out in black and white. In June 2020, Judge Royce Lamberth warned that Bolton had “likely jeopardized national security by disclosing classified information in violation of his nondisclosure agreement obligations.” The judge only allowed the book to hit shelves because “the horse is already out of the barn,” given the publication of excerpts and the shipment of 200,000 copies of the book.

 

Lamberth went further in his ruling, stressing that Bolton had “gambled with the national security of the United States” and that the government was “likely to succeed on the merits” of proving he unlawfully disclosed classified material. Translation: Bolton didn’t just break trust — he may have also broken the law.

 

I served with Bolton, and he was far too frequently a loose cannon, bent on bombings and coups— Doctor Strangelove with a mustache. He agitated for airstrikes, pushed regime-change fantasies, and obsessed over military solutions when diplomacy was working. Then, instead of honoring executive privilege and confidential debate, Bolton acknowledged that in writing his memoir he relied on the “copious notes” he had conspicuously taken inside the White House.

 

That isn’t service. That isn’t patriotism. That’s profiteering off of America’s secrets.

 

For example, Bolton described confidential U.S. deliberations on how to fracture Nicolás Maduro’s control and prompt military defections. That kind of blueprint isn’t something you hand to the public — or to Maduro’s intelligence services. Such a disclosure of national-defense information without authorization can constitute a crime. Bolton puffed himself up as the great strategist of Caracas, but in reality, his disclosures were reckless speculation. No covert plan was exposed, no law broken by President Trump, and no evidence of U.S. misconduct was ever substantiated.

 

Another case pertained to Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and Turkey’s Halkbank. In 2019, the U.S. Justice Department charged Halkbank with helping Iran evade American sanctions by funneling oil and gas revenues through front companies and falsifying records. Bolton recounts a conversation in his book where Turkey’s strongman pressed Trump to back off. But that wasn’t a colorful anecdote — it was an active criminal matter even at the time he published, which subsequently went all the way to the Supreme Court.

 

Under federal law, removing or retaining classified drafts or notes of such a meeting can be punishable by prison time. Moreover, in the end, Bolton’s claims amounted to nothing but bluster. There was no Justice Department retreat on Halkbank, no evidence whatsoever that the prosecution was derailed, and no Trump misconduct.

 

On North Korea, Bolton revealed the inside playbook of U.S. negotiations with Kim Jong-un and consultations with South Korea. Seoul publicly blasted him for breaking trust. Allied intelligence, if documented in notes taken outside secure channels, could implicate either of two sections of the U.S. code covering unauthorized disclosure of communications intelligence.

 

Bolton’s book also exposed the advice and concerns of Britain, France, and other NATO partners during closed-door consultations. Foreign-government information is automatically classified under U.S. law. Publishing it didn’t just humiliate our allies; it shredded trust. Not only that, but his sensationalized speculation about Trump breaching the NATO treaty proved to be just that.

 

These aren’t minor indiscretions. They are statutory minefields. Collectively, these and other “Big Reveals” in Bolton’s book create a trove of national defense intelligence scattered by someone who took an oath of office to guard it.

 

I said it plainly on Newsmax when Bolton’s disclosures were under fresh scrutiny: “Hey, John, the difference between you and a president is that presidents can take anything they want and declassify it. And brother, you can’t.”

 

I know the stakes because I’ve paid the price. Steve Bannon and I both went to prison for defending the Constitution and our system of separation of powers. If evidence is found and indictments made, Bolton may one day go to prison for shredding that Constitution, defying executive privilege, and trampling safeguards meant to protect America’s security.

 

If that happens, Bolton won’t be remembered for his book tour. He’ll be remembered for the sequel he writes in prison.

 

https://thehill.com/opinion/national-security/5468893-john-bolton-cashed-in-and-america-paid-the-price/amp/

Anonymous ID: e8ce56 Aug. 26, 2025, 9:20 p.m. No.23514049   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4100

Jack Smith files first response to criminal probe

 

Attorneys for former special counsel Jack Smith, who brought criminal charges against President Trump, denounced a watchdog investigation into Smith’s work as “imaginary and unfounded” in a letter to the Office of Special Counsel.

 

The letter, obtained by The Associated Press on Tuesday, marked Smith’s first response to news that the government watchdog was investigating Smith for potential violations of the Hatch Act, which prohibits government employees from engaging in political activity.

 

Trump allies have accused the Biden-era special counsel of pursuing criminal charges against Trump in an effort to thwart his White House bid. Former Attorney General Merrick Garland tapped Smith in 2022, three days before Trump launched his 2024 campaign.

 

In their letter to acting head of the Office of Special Counsel, Jamieson Greer, attorneys Lanny Breuer and Peter Koski said the investigation into Smith’s prosecutions of Trump is “wholly without merit.”

 

“Mr. Smith’s actions as Special Counsel were consistent with the decisions of a prosecutor who has devoted his career to following the facts and the law, without fear or favor and without regard for the political consequences, not because of them,” the lawyers wrote.

 

Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) requested the watchdog investigation, alleging Smith sought to interfere in the election by trying to fast-track cases, pointing to one instance when he asked the Supreme Court to rule on an issue before a lower court.

 

But Smith’s attorneys pushed back on that argument, insisting he made no decisions with an eye toward the election.

 

“A review of the record and procedural history demonstrates the opposite — Mr. Smith was fiercely committed to making prosecutorial decisions based solely on the evidence, he steadfastly followed applicable Department of Justice guidelines and the Principles of Federal Prosecution, and he did not let the pending election influence his investigative or prosecutorial decision-making,” Smith’s lawyers wrote.

 

“The predicate for this investigation,” the lawyers added, “is imaginary and unfounded.”

 

Smith brought criminal charges against the president in two distinct cases: one over the president’s efforts to stay in power after losing the 2020 election, and another over his mishandling of classified documents and his refusal to comply with requests for their return.

 

Both cases were dropped before Trump took office in January.

 

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5471320-jack-smith-probe-basis-imaginary-and-unfounded-lawyers-argue/amp/

Anonymous ID: e8ce56 Aug. 26, 2025, 9:32 p.m. No.23514078   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4100

Ukrainian refugee, 23, who fled war for safer life in US knifed to death by homeless career criminal in North Carolina

 

A 23-year-old Ukrainian refugee who recently fled her war-torn home for a safer life in the US was knifed to death by a homeless career criminal at a North Carolina train station last week, according to family members and authorities.

 

Iryna Zarutska suffered multiple stab wounds and was pronounced dead at the East/West Boulevard light rail station in South End, Charlotte just before 10 p.m. Friday, the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department said Saturday.

 

Zarutska had “recently arrived in the United States, seeking safety from the war and hoping for a new beginning,” according to a GoFundMe page set up to fundraise for the young woman’s aunt and other family members during the “heartbreaking time.”

 

“Tragically, her life was cut short far too soon… This is an irreparable loss for her family,” the statement read.

 

Photos taken by local outlet WSOC-TV showed police tape cordoning off the platform and a train at the light rail station that night. Police have yet to confirm if the stabbing took place on the train, platform, or nearby, according to the Charlotte Observer.

 

Decarlos Brown Jr., 34, was identified as the suspect and transported to a local hospital with non-life-threatening injuries Friday night. He has since been arrested and charged with first-degree murder, cops said.

 

Brown has been arrested a slew of times since 2011 for felony larceny, robbery with a dangerous weapon, and communicating threats, according to court records obtained by The Post.

 

He is homeless and served five years in prison for the robbery with a deadly weapon charge, according to WSOC-TV.

 

Other past charges have been dropped, according to the Charlotte Observer.

 

The alleged killer, however, currently has pending charges for misuse of the 911 system in January following a police welfare check — which revealed his troubling thoughts, the outlet reported.

 

Brown told authorities during the visit he believed someone had given him a “man-made” material that controlled when he ate, walked, and talked, an affidavit obtained by the newspaper said.

 

“Brown wanted officers to investigate this ‘man-made’ material that was inside of his body,” the affidavit said.

 

Officers then advised Brown that he was suffering a medical issue, and there was nothing more they could do to help him.

 

He became upset over their response and called 911. He was arrested after he hung up the phone, the outlet reported.

 

Police have not released information on what led up to Friday’s deadly stabbing. The investigation into the incident remains ongoing.

 

https://nypost.com/2025/08/25/us-news/ukrainian-refugee-23-who-fled-war-for-safer-life-in-us-knifed-to-death-by-homeless-career-criminal-in-north-carolina/

Anonymous ID: e8ce56 Aug. 26, 2025, 10:13 p.m. No.23514185   🗄️.is 🔗kun

14 arrested in largest Home Depot theft ring ever ($10 million in merchandise)

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=99X0UhCCuUI