>>23594416

"blusterous extremists"

tell it like it T I is

>>23594429

my you say things that aren't blatant psyop.

nothing is more perposterous than that of a psychological operation conceived by college students on work study grants working for the deep state.

>>23594451

I was clear.

It's not a dismissal.

I am making a call for you to not be a blatant psychological operator.

>>23594473

you got that.

because you are.

you won't even deny it.

don't you have an ancient chinese proverb to use for this?

>>23594625

Mia Farrow?

>>23594632

wrong.

if you really think so give us some ids and some links.

you know it's not true so you make us do the work which will be fruitless.

>>23594650

1. You IP hop.

that means you're a shill

1. It's easy to compile a list of links that would be the ones you suggest, you won't.

2. You say 'look for yourself' which means you just want people to waste their time.

the only posts that are 'Q posts' are ones wiht the correct name and trip code.

as far as 'Q team'?

you can't say anyone is or isn't Q team as you have no way to prove it either way.

so either provide a list of linked post numbers or stop.

thank you very much and have a wonderful rest of your shift.

>>23594670

then get a list of linked post numbers.

Simple.

on the move: where you going?

>>23594662

you were wrong and he's still dead.

>>23594684

1. I'm not a shill

2. I'm not scared

3. I would love to see what you think are Q posts. you say that there were Q-team posts but you won't show us.

so I conclude you're a shill trying to waste time.

My conclusion might be wrong but you do nothing to prove me wrong by either 1. showing us the posts.

or

1. giving a synopsis of what you learned from them.

so I conclude you're a time wasting shill.

and I remain polite and wish you a hppy rest of your shift.

all you have to do is give us a list of links or tell us what you suppose Q team was telling us, but you won't.

so you won't do anything but you want us to just trust you.

and then you call me a shill and tell me I'm scared, but I'm not either of those.

>>23594705

you provide nothing and explect to be respected for making a shill like statement that seems to just be for mocking or for time wasting.

and now you're bringing up some stale news story from 5 years ago?

>>23594710

it's like shooting fish in a barrel.

and these people are probably paid.

>>23594721

my feelings?

when did I show you those?

now you pretend to be a 'teacher' here?

seriously, take your own advice.

I've been here for a very long time and I've seen a very lot in these breads. none of the games you are playing are new to me.

PS: I asked a question to have the posts linked so that others can see what they think.

but apparently linking the posts is just too hard and/or the person is afraid of being mocked for posting stuff that really is obviously not from 'Q team'.

>>23594763

what are you suggesting? I can read that person's mind and know what posts he was reading that he says are 'Q Team'?

It's not unreasonable to ask for a link or to provide an link, especially if one makes a claim that 'Q team is actively posting, I read the posts'