All anons interested in true history take note: We are witnessing the formation of a modern day martyr. Few symbols or more powerful, or more dangerous, than that of the martyr.
"May you live in interesting times" - Ancient Chinese curse
DIsmiss me if you like anon, history proves me correct. Let us hope it does not follow pattern this time.
There is no point in my arguing whether or not I am pushing a psyop. Anything I say you would simply take as proof I am.
You don't want to consider the truth of what I said therefore you justify dismissing it by labeling me as "opponent".
Do you dispute that throughout history the symbol of martyr has been one of the most powerful?
Do you dispute that throughout history the symbol of the martyr has been used to justify atrocities?
Note that I use the word martyr in a non-religious context and that I said the "formation" of a martyr not the "creation" of one. I would certainly agree that it is only possible to definitively arbitrate the formation of a martyr in retrospect, I believe that in the case of Kirk all the signs are there. Whether this is an attempt, like with George Floyd, to manufacture a martyr or an organic formation only time will tell.
I expect nothing.
I repeat:
Do you dispute that throughout history the symbol of martyr has been one of the most powerful?
Do you dispute that throughout history the symbol of the martyr has been used to justify atrocities?
I add: Do you disputethat the case of George Floyd was an attept to create a martyr?
Ah yes, name calling, the last refuge of a failed argument.
You may well be correct. It is of interest to me the external factors which change an assassination into martyrdom.