>>23595039 pb
Redefining words is not about freedom of expression.
Aren't these issues about perception and choice?
I think that the current problem has developed precisely because there has been no progress in redefining the term or in clarifying the underlying issue.
Also, considering the issues you describe, isn't it necessary to redefine the actions that suppress freedom of expression using the term 'freedom of expression'?
Isn't redefinition a necessary part of the evolutionary process?
Let me give another example.
In the past, some have defined COVID vaccines as safe.
Is it necessary to redefine these?
What are the issue that arise from that?
If change perspective, isn't 'definition' just a word/idea that clarifies something at a given time?