Anonymous ID: af3c10 Sept. 22, 2025, 12:20 p.m. No.23638592   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8736 >>8915 >>9125 >>9264 >>9308

Spanish Navy Chief Refutes Calls to Block Migrant Boats, Citing Maritime Law

Admiral Antonio Piñeiro stated that theprimary mission of the Spanish Navy is to rescue migrants in distress at sea, not to combat illegal immigration, emphasizing maritime law over political ideology.

20 sept 2025 - 04:55 • 3 min read

 

Admiral General Antonio Piñeiro, the highest-ranking officer in the Spanish Navy,has firmly rejected the notion that military vessels should be used to intercept and block migrant boats. Speaking at a defense forum, Piñeiro emphasized that maritime law dictates the Navy's primary role in such situations is to save lives.

 

During an exchange with Javier Ortega Smith, a representative from the far-right party Vox, Piñeiro stated, "I am going to be very clear.It is a mandate that the Law of the Sea dictates: the Navy, if it finds a canoe at sea, its main mission is to save people if they are in danger. And that's that." He was ==responding to Ortega Smith's inquiry about increasing the permanent presence of military vessels in areas like the Strait of Gibraltar, Ceuta,

Melilla, and the Canary Islands to counter irregular migration==.

 

Piñeiro, who has served for over 40 years in the Navy, clarified that directives forcombating illegal immigration should come from political bodies, not the military. While acknowledging that the military can assist countries of origin in surveillance efforts, he stressed that the operational directives are a political matter.

 

His remarks come amidst ongoing political debate, with Vox repeatedly advocating for the armed forces to play a more direct role in stopping migrant arrivals. This is not the first time a high-ranking military official has pushed back against such proposals. In the past, the Chief of Defense Staff, Admiral Teodoro López Calderón,also affirmed that the obligation of any Spanish warship is to rescue those in peril at sea.

 

Piñeiro drew upon his personal experiences to illustrate the gravity of the situation. He recounted instances where, as a commander, he faced the agonizing decision of prioritizing which groups of shipwrecked individuals to rescue, knowing that not all could be saved. He described the "impotence" of seeing hundreds of people in the water, unable to swim, and having only limited capacity to rescue them.

 

"To have 250 or 300 people in the water who don't know how to swim, who are going to drown. And you with a RIB or two [rigid-hulled inflatable boats] that can carry 10 or 20, and you have to choose between one and another, knowing that by the time you go and come back, the one you were going to pick up is no longer there… That is very hard," Piñeiro stated, noting the psychological impact these rescue operations can have on military personnel.

 

While Piñeiro's response was seen by some as directly countering Vox's stance,the party later suggested on social media that the admiral had been unduly influenced by the current government. Piñeiro, who assumed his current role in 2023, has been described by colleagues as direct, frank, and a strong leader.

 

Separately, in a different political context,Isabel Díaz Ayuso, the President of the Community of Madrid, addressed issues of ideology and identity. Speaking at the opening of the university academic year, Ayuso criticized both the left and Vox, asserting thateducational institutions should not be "instruments of social engineering" or sites for "ideological wars." She also emphasized that individuals should not be subjected to vetoes based on their race, nationality, religion, sex, or origin, a statement seen as a divergence from some of Vox's proposals,such as banning the Islamic veil in public spaces. Ayuso argued that such prohibitions would contravene the Spanish Constitution and fundamental rights.

 

https://www.fifthbell.com/spanish-navy-chief-refutes-calls-to-block-migrant-boats-citing-maritime-law

Anonymous ID: af3c10 Sept. 22, 2025, 1:20 p.m. No.23638823   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8915 >>9125 >>9264 >>9308

Supreme Court takes up dispute over Trump's authority to fire FTC member

Rebecca Kelly Slaughter, a member of the Federal Trade Commission, will not remain in office while the case is being litigated. Sept. 22, 2025, 3:27 PM EDT By Lawrence Hurley

 

WASHINGTON — Taking up a major case on the structure of the federal government, the Supreme Court on Monday agreed to consider whether President Donald Trump can fire a member of the Federal Trade Commission despite a law that limits his ability to do so.

 

While the court is deciding the case, a lower court ruling in favor of the commissioner in question, Rebecca Kelly Slaughter, will remain on hold, the court said. That means she will not remain in office while the case is litigated.

In weighing the case, the conservative-majority court will decide whether a key 1935 Supreme Court ruling called Humphrey's Executor v. United States, which upheld restrictions on the president's power to fire FTC members, should be overturned.

 

The ruling would apply not just to the FTC but also other federal agencies with similar restrictions.

 

Chief Justice John Roberts had issued a temporary stay on Sept. 8 that allowed Trump to remove Slaughter from office.

 

Three liberal justices dissented from the court's decision to allow Slaughter's firing while litigation continues.

 

Justice Elena Kagan wrote that the 1935 ruling remains on the books until such time as the court overturns it. But in the meantime, the court has summarily "handed full control of all those agencies to the president," she wrote.

 

Complaining about the court's growing number of decisions that grant emergency requests filed by the Trump administration, Kagan said that the process had been used "to transfer government authority from Congress to the president, and thus to re-shape the nation's separation of powers."

 

The court's actions would suggest the conservative majority is sympathetic to the Trump administration's arguments that the legal provisions restricting the president's ability to remove FTC members without cause unlawfully limit his powers under Article 2 of the Constitution.

 

A second legal question concerns whether Slaughter even has a legal avenue to remain in office if she ultimately wins on her argument that the firing was illegal.

 

The court said oral arguments will be held in December.

 

Trump fired both Democratic commissioners on the five-member FTC, Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya, in March. Both challenged the move, although Bedoya later dropped out of the case.

 

A federal judge in July ruled in favor of Slaughter, citing the 1935 Supreme Court precedent. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reached a similar conclusion.

 

This year, Trump has also sought to remove members of other independent federal agencies, which the Supreme Court has allowed.

 

The Supreme Court, whose majority has been skeptical of the concept of independent federal agencies that are not subject to presidential control, has undermined such protections in recent years in a series of cases involving other agencies.

 

Trump has sought to dramatically re-shape the federal government using an aggressive form of executive power.

 

In addition to seeking to control hitherto independent agencies, he has also sought to dismantle some agencies and has fired thousands of federal workers.

 

In another high-stakes showdown, he is trying to assert control over the Federal Reserve, which has traditionally acted independently. (see "acted independently" was their choice and the US leaders must have the choice. (these people they ARE NOT, and can't be.)

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-takes-dispute-trump-authority-fire-ftc-member-rcna230345

 

REMOVE THE TERM INDEPENDENT AGENCY, IT DOESN’T EXIST. IF THESE PEOPLE DOING WORK WITH THE US GOVERNMENT, OR US AGENCY, THEY CAN NEVER BE INDEPENDENT, THAT’S LIKE INVITING SPIES INTO SABOTAGE THE COUNTRY, BUT THEY SAID THEY WERE INDEPENDENT THE AGENCY HEAD OF AGENCY.

Anonymous ID: af3c10 Sept. 22, 2025, 1:24 p.m. No.23638838   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8848 >>8849 >>8873 >>9226

Josh Denny

@JoshDenny

 

This is why Gavin McInnes is the GOAT.

 

I couldn’t agree more, and I’m honored to call him a friend.

 

Every comedian needs to see this.

1:00

 

Last edited

3:44 AM · Sep 19, 2025

·

882.3K

Views

https://x.com/JoshDenny/status/1968944189690749423