‘SUPREME FRIEND’: Sarah Ferguson, Under Fire, Has Patronage Removed from Four Charities – Email Surfaces of Duchess of York Telling Epstein She Was Lying When She Disowned Him

“Julia’s House, a children’s hospice charity serving families in Dorset and Wiltshire, was the first to remove Sarah Ferguson, the former wife of Prince Andrew, saying it was ‘inappropriate’ for her to continue in the role.

Later on Monday, the Natasha Allergy Research Foundation, the Children’s Literacy Charity and Prevent Breast Cancer also announced they had dropped the duchess as patron.”

Sarah Ferguson emailed Jeffrey Epstein in 2011 calling him a "supreme friend," despite saying she had cut ties after his conviction.

Editor-at-large, Charlotte Griffiths: “This is the moment they’re going to get kicked out of the Royal Lodge.”

https://twitter.com/i/status/1969779903693537593

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cddmr6v0jpzo

New UN Amb. Mike Waltz Comes Out Swinging: 'Will Defend Every Inch Of NATO Territory' Against Russia

It was only days ago that new US Ambassador to the United Nations Mike Waltz was belatedly confirmed by the Senate, in a drawn-out and somewhat embarrassing ordeal which took six months. Waltz took his seat at the UN Security Council for the first time Monday, and already came out swinging with anti-Russian sentiment, and appearing to side with the hawks in NATO.

"The United States stands by our NATO allies in the face of these airspace violations," Waltz said. "And I want to take this first opportunity to repeat and to emphasize the United States and our allies will defend every inch of NATO territory."

Estonia and its partners in Europe have been making a lot of noise over the alleged Russian jet violation of its airspace days ago, which Moscow has vehemently rejected.

Days prior to that, there were reported drone incursion incidents also in NATO member Poland and Romania, resulting in jets being scrambled to monitor and intercept the UAVs which had been initially operating over Ukraine.

While Waltz's warnings can be seen as hawkish, in his prior national security advisory position, he expressed Trump's vision that Ukraine will never be in NATO. For example, last spring:

National security adviser Mike Waltz said on Sunday the U.S. does “not see Ukraine being a member of NATO.”

“One thing is clear, we do not see Ukraine being a member of NATO, because that would automatically drag U.S. troops in,” Waltz told CNN’s Dana Bash on “State of the Union.”

That prior position appears incongruous with the new assertions as UN ambassador that the United States is ready to 'defend every inch' of NATO.

Even Trump last week downplayed the drone incidents as well as latest jet incursions in Estonia. Trump merely said over the weekend "I don't like it" and previously suggested the drone activity was inadvertent.

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/new-un-amb-mike-waltz-comes-out-swinging-will-defend-every-inch-nato-territory-against

>>23639620

NATO member calls for deal to lower risk of war with Russia

As long as the hostilities continue, the conflict could spill over, Hungarian Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto has said

Ending the Ukraine conflict would entirely diffuse the risk of escalation between NATO and Russia, Hungarian Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto said in an interview with TASS on Monday.

Moscow has long characterized the conflict as a proxy war led by the US-led military bloc against Russia using Ukrainian manpower.

Speaking to the Russian news agency on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly in New York, Szijjarto suggested peace in Ukraine as a way to prevent a dangerous escalation between Russia and NATO.

“If there is peace, if this [Ukraine] war ends, then we can reduce the risk of escalation to zero. But as long as this war continues, I fear that events will occur that carry the risk of escalation, and that is truly bad news,” he said.

Earlier this month, the top diplomat said that Ukraine and the EU were attempting to “drag” Hungary into the conflict. Despite pressure from Brussels, Budapest has resisted providing military support to Kiev and opposed the bloc’s sanctions against Russia, instead calling for a diplomatic solution.

In recent weeks, EU and NATO members Poland and Estonia have both accused Russia of violating their airspace – claims Moscow has denied as baseless.

In response to Russian drones allegedly crossing into Polish territory earlier this month, NATO launched its Eastern Sentry operation to increase the US-led military bloc’s presence near its eastward flank.

The Russian Foreign Ministry has stated that the drone allegations were fabricated for the purpose of derailing the Ukraine peace talks. Russia has long accused European NATO members of working to prolong and escalate the conflict.

According to Moscow, the US-led military bloc is already “de facto” fighting a war against Russia.

“NATO provides both indirect and direct support to the Kiev regime,” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said last week. Despite this, Moscow remains “ready and willing” to work towards diplomatically settling the Ukraine crisis, he added.

https://www.rt.com/russia/625080-nato-country-ukraine-peace/

Canada keeps bankrolling Ukraine’s war crimes

The new prime minister, just like the old one, is handing Kiev the cash much needed at home

Carney chose Ukrainian Independence Day to voice the Canadian government’s continued pledge to support Ukraine. As he landed in Kiev on August 24, Carney posted on X, “On this Ukrainian Independence Day, and at this critical moment in their nation’s history, Canada is stepping up our support and our efforts towards a just and lasting peace for Ukraine.”

Later in the day he posted, “After three years at war, Ukrainians urgently need more military equipment. Canada is answering that call, providing $2 billion for drones, armoured vehicles, and other critical resources.” This latest pledge brings Canada’s expenditure on Ukraine since February 2022 to nearly $22 billion.

Further, he pledged to potentially send Canadian or allied soldiers, stating, “I would not exclude the presence of troops.”

Pause for a moment to examine the utter lack of logic behind these statements: For “peace” for Ukraine, Canada will support further war to ensure more Ukrainian men are ripped off the streets and forced to the front lines, where they will inevitably die in a battle they didn’t sign up for.

Like his European counterparts, Carney’s insistence on prolonging the war is in contrast to Russia’s position of finding a resolution.

I recently spoke with former Ambassador Charles Freeman, an American career diplomat for 30 years. Speaking of how the Trump administration, “began in office by perpetuating the blindness and deafness of the Biden administration to what the Russian side in this conflict has said from the very beginning,” he outlined the terms that Russia made clear in December 2021, “and from which it has basically not wavered.”

It’s worth keeping in mind that Canada has been one of the main belligerents in Ukraine, funding and training Ukrainian troops for many years before the 2022 start of Russia’s military operation.

Canada’s training of Ukrainian troops included members of the notorious neo-Nazi terrorists of the Azov regiment. Former Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland proudly waved a Banderite flag in 2022. She was also proud of her dear grandfather, who was a chief Nazi propagandist.

In 2023, the Trudeau administration brought to speak in the Canadian parliament a Ukrainian Nazi, Yaroslav Hunka, who had been a voluntary member of the 1st Galician Division of the Waffen SS – well known for their mass slaughter of civilians.

Carney, in light of this, is merely keeping with the tradition of Ottawa’s support of extremism – including Nazism – in Ukraine (and in Canada). This support is not at all about protecting Ukrainian civilians.

Supporting Ukrainian war crimes

Canada’s continued support to Ukraine makes it complicit in the atrocities Ukraine commits. I myself have documented just some of Ukrainian war crimes in the Donbass, in 2019 and heavily throughout 2022.

https://www.rt.com/news/625053-canada-kiev-war-crimes/

>>23639751

FFS that's a bit much

He was built up by Israeli intel

who then likely killed him

So another manufactured hero

Mike Adams–Powerful forces are now invoking a religious war that will escalate to World War III

Charlie's tragic death is now being exploited to promote a religious war, both a domestic one (against the political Left) and an international one that targets Iran.

We are all being plunged into a blueprint for emotional appeal, religious fervor and rapid escalations of violence across the world.

And yes, the globalist powers need this war to achieve their own anti-human goals."

https://www.brighteon.com/0cc9e5dc-6d16-4402-80f8-b4d8491a16cc

Why isn't anyone DEMANDING the AUTOPSY REPORT?

>>23639842

https://archive.md/

>>23639864

New Short Docu Fully Explains…how Communist and Globalist Narratives are One and the Same!

https://youtu.be/4YY6XNlqmSo

"Christ is King" – Gab CEO Andrew Torba on Christian Nationalism:

https://news.gab.com/2025/09/how-to-conquer-the-death-cult/

We must return, with unapologetic fervor, to the Christianity that built the West.

We must preach a God who is a Father, a King, and a Judge not a vague, affirming force. We must call men to be saints, not therapists; to be leaders of households and nations, not passive observers. We must reclaim the arts, the laws, the sciences, and the governance of our people as our rightful domain, given to us by God to steward for His glory.

This means cleansing our institutions. It means defunding and disempowering every committee, diocese, and seminary that trades in this death-cult poison. It means supporting only those bishops and pastors who act like fathers and generals, not like corporate spokesmen. It means building parallel networks of education, media, and community that operate wholly outside the corrupt systems of the world.

We are not called to be a quaint subculture. We are called to be a conquering army, baptizing the nations for the glory of God. The same faith that once turned the Roman world upside down is still there, waiting beneath the layers of weakness and compromise. The remnant remains intact. It is time to rediscover it. It is time to stop managing our retreat and start planning our advance.

The world offers death. We must offer life, fierce, abundant, and eternal. We must be so strong in faith, so clear in truth, and so bold in action that the world has no choice but to once again reckon with the power of the God we serve.

Do not let the fire in your belly die. The righteous anger, the profound grief, the clarity of purpose that Charlie Kirk's martyrdom ignited within you. This is not a fleeting emotion to be forgotten with the next news cycle. This is a sacred fuel. Guard it. Nurture it. Feed it with prayer, with action, and with an unbreakable resolve to ensure his death was not in vain.

Let this flame forge you into a sharper tool for this battle, a more formidable wall against the advancing darkness. The world wants you to get tired, to get comfortable, to forget. Do not give them that satisfaction. Honor Charlie's memory by making this fire the eternal pilot light of your spirit, guiding your every thought, word, and deed until the work is done and our people are once again free, sovereign, and thriving under God."

Project for the New American Century (PNAC): Neocon Robert Kagan Foresees Critical Geopolitical Juncture

Neocon godfather Robert Kagan has written a new column for the Atlantic—and his decrees on the Ukraine war usually presage a critical time, for which he is summoned to rustle up urgent support.

Most know Kagan as the husband of Victoria Nuland and co-founder of the seminal Project for a New American Century which has been credited with laying the blueprints for America’s disastrous Middle Eastern entanglements in the post-9/11 era.

The article was spurred by the drone scare over Poland—which we now understand had all the trappings of a false flag or hoax. Kagan frames it as being a kind of crossroads wherein Trump and America’s commitment to NATO has reached its “put-up-or-shutup” final decisive moment. It should be mentioned, on this note, that Trump just earlier today did claim that he would ‘protect Poland’ and the Baltic states if “Russia keeps escalating”.

Reporter: “Will you help defend Poland and the Baltic states from Russia if Russia keeps escalating?”

Trump: “Yeah, I would. I would.”

But here’s where it begins getting interesting. After the setup, Kagan starts building a deceptive parallel argument, essentially in geopolitical support of Russia’s position:

Putin, on the other hand, had every reason to force the matter to a head sooner rather than later. The only thing surprising about his attack on Poland is that he didn’t do it sooner. (Russia denies having sent the drones into Polish territory.)

Of course, we must immediately assume any such concession represents a devious psycho-strategic trap on Kagan’s cunning part.

The legal case for Russia’s ostensibly justifiable actions that he builds, though, is convincing in its surprising historical impartiality:

Start with the fact that such an attack has always been a viable option for Putin. People don’t pay much attention these days to the “laws” of neutrality, but for centuries prior to World War II, it was understood that if one nation’s government provided weapons and war matériel directly to another nation at war with a third nation, that legally made the donor a belligerent in the war and therefore subject to attack. An exception was made for private arms sales, which was how the United States managed to supply weapons to Britain and France during the period when Washington was neutral in World War I. But direct, government-to-government arms provisions and arms sales were a violation of neutrality, which gave the third nation the right, if it chose, to go to war with the providing nation or to use force to cut off the supply. The laws of neutrality don’t distinguish between aggressor and victim, because those distinctions are not always clear-cut. If Putin had at any time decided to bomb the supply lines to Ukraine from Poland, Romania, or Slovakia, he would have been within his rights to do so.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/robert-kagan-foresees-critical-geopolitical-juncture/5900918

Five Mexican Nationals Face Federal Charges Following Seizure of over a Thousand Pounds of Methamphetamine

https://www.justice.gov/usao-ndga/pr/five-mexican-nationals-face-federal-charges-following-seizure-over-thousand-pounds

Former California Police Officer Sentenced to Five Consecutive Life Sentences for Sexually Assaulting Four Women He Encountered While On Duty

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/former-california-police-officer-sentenced-five-consecutive-life-sentences-sexually

Australia is still going to poison kids –'Experts say'

Experts say paracetamol safe for pregnancy, no proof for autism link made by Donald Trump

The agency that regulates medicines in Australia says paracetamol is considered safe for use in pregnancy, despite Donald Trump saying it increases the risk of autism in babies.

Mr Trump said that he believed pregnant women should "strongly" limit the use of paracetamol, also known as acetaminophen, unless they had an "extremely high fever" that they could not "tough out".

"Pregnant women should talk to their doctors," Mr Trump said.

"Ideally, you don't take it at all."

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which regulates medicines in the US, will issue a physician's notice about the potential risks of taking paracetamol during pregnancy and begin the process of initiating a safety label change on the medication, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr said.

But the Australian regulator, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), along with the Australian Medical Association (AMA), the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and their American counterpart, have all reaffirmed the safety and benefits of paracetamol in pregnancy.

"Paracetamol remains Pregnancy Category A in Australia, meaning that it is considered safe for use in pregnancy," the TGA said in a statement.

"The TGA has no current active safety investigations for paracetamol and autism, or paracetamol and neurodevelopmental disorders more broadly."

AMA president Dr Danielle McMullin told ABC News Breakfast that regulators considered paracetamol safe to use during pregnancy.

"Of course, like all medications, we try to use as little as possible when pregnant, but certainly for pain and fever in pregnancy, the advice here in Australia still is that paracetamol is still a reasonable and safe option for pregnant women to use," she said.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-09-23/trump-administration-links-autism-to-paracetamol-tga-says-safe/105803566

>>23640090

>>23640145

Now they will push new vaccines