TYB
Here's the one I reference, has some layman breakdowns.
RULE 1: “Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.” Power is derived from 2 main sources – money and people. “Have-Nots” must build power from flesh and blood. (These are two things of which there is a plentiful supply. Government and corporations always have a difficult time appealing to people, and usually do so almost exclusively with economic arguments.)
RULE 2: “Never go outside the expertise of your people.” It results in confusion, fear, and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone. (Organizations under attack wonder why radicals don’t address the “real” issues. This is why. They avoid things with which they have no knowledge.)
RULE 3: “Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.” Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety, and uncertainty. (This happens all the time. Watch how many organizations under attack are blind-sided by seemingly irrelevant arguments that they are then forced to address.)
RULE 4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules. (This is a serious rule. The besieged entity’s very credibility and reputation is at stake, because if activists catch it lying or not living up to its commitments, they can continue to chip away at the damage.)
RULE 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions. (Pretty crude, rude and mean, huh? They want to create anger and fear.)
RULE 6: “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.” They’ll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They’re doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones. (Radical activists, in this sense, are no different than any other human being. We all avoid “un-fun” activities, and but we revel at and enjoy the ones that work and bring results.)
RULE 7: “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.” Don’t become old news. (Even radical activists get bored. So to keep them excited and involved, organizers are constantly coming up with new tactics.)
RULE 8: “Keep the pressure on. Never let up.” Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new. (Attack, attack, attack from all sides, never giving the reeling organization a chance to rest, regroup, recover and re-strategize.)
RULE 9: “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.” Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist. (Perception is reality. Large organizations always prepare a worst-case scenario, something that may be furthest from the activists’ minds. The upshot is that the organization will expend enormous time and energy, creating in its own collective mind the direst of conclusions. The possibilities can easily poison the mind and result in demoralization.)
RULE 10: “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.” Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog. (Unions used this tactic. Peaceful [albeit loud] demonstrations during the heyday of unions in the early to mid-20th Century incurred management’s wrath, often in the form of violence that eventually brought public sympathy to their side.)
RULE 11: “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.” Never let the enemy score points because you’re caught without a solution to the problem. (Old saw: If you’re not part of the solution, you’re part of the problem. Activist organizations have an agenda, and their strategy is to hold a place at the table, to be given a forum to wield their power. So, they have to have a compromise solution.)
RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)
Odd you were compelled to post that after the Alinsky Rules were posted, huh? You started out with a regular meme. Nice to know that SP fella that OSS tried isolating and polarizing was such a problem to this board that how he memed and what he memed are all you seem to obsess over, as if you want to own, control, and hijack a reputation of someone else for your own gain. Later.
Many shall come in His name. I'm not cool with that.
>became verbum non-grata almost immediately.
Yeah, because that's what nothing burgers are. The attempt was made though. It's Pepe's sewers now.
>I've noticed that Vaush often uses stuff from this list when he debates conservatives.
Never watched any of that guy's stuff so I couldn't say for sure if he does or not, but I'll take your word for it. The shills here use Alinsky's shit all the time, that along with the COINTELPRO is another good one to study to recognize what the paid lackeys are up to, they tend to use that one too. Communists, fascists, satanists, and radical Islam seem to be working together and calling themselves globalists.
Twitch streamers have handlers that tell them what they're allowed to say and depending on the day even what to say. Found that out a few years back. Never did watch that Destiny guy. Odd that he accuses people of being a cuck while letting other men sleep with his girlfriend.
>Also, I probably have more money than you so you are probably not even worth talking to, bitch ass nigga.
Do you think you get to take that money with you that you lord over others? KEK! You never learn, do you?
KEK
Never read that one by him, might have to check it out. Only ever read the first two books of his Heechee saga, "Gateway" and "Beyond the Blue Event Horizon" which I both enjoyed. Might have to get around to reading the other two books in that series and "The Space Merchants."
Currently going through the bible in audiobook form. Started it in the middle of June. Almost 83 hours long and only 6h28m left. In 1 Corinthians chapter 7 at the moment. It's never taken me this long to go through a book before, even when I read it rather than listened to it 30 years ago but I just skimmed/sped-read through it back then. Lost count how many times I was out walking and listening to it and I'd just stop in the middle of my tracks, mouth hanging open and not moving, standing completely still like a statue for 30 seconds or so looking like a dork while I processed what I just listened to.
If you haven't read this one yet, you may want to give it a go, but it's more post-apocalyptic than dystopian, but does seem to make it onto dystopian book lists depending on who's making them. There's a movie rendition of it too that's pretty good staring the Vigo Mortenson.
Only a 287 page book, 6.75 hour audiobook so it's a quick read/listen. It's good, both book and movie rendition.
>Ok I cannot possibly imagine someone properly reading 200 pages in 6 hours.
I picked up VanderMeer's Annihilation in 2015 and started reading it. The next thing I knew it was 5 hours later and I was almost done, and it felt like I was only reading for an hour, so going through 200 pages in 6 hours can happen. Then I watched the movie and was all like, "Why do they have names? They addressed themselves by their fields of study in the book. Why was there a city instead of an underground tower? Where was the lighthouse keeper? Why was the guy that was growing into some biological monstrosity in an empty pool and not against the wall in the underground tower? What was that silver thing mirroring movements at the end and why didn't they use 'the creeper' from the book?" I was completely disappointed with the movie, they changed so much that ruined the suspension of disbelief for me, but the book was fricken amazing.
>Gosh It's a great day for the rule of SP
You clowns just keep on proselytizing the initials of the nickname you gave me in 2021 that you're now obsessed with trying to hijack, control, and own, you're doing great.
"He said he drove truck, I'm going to write "How's my driving" on every bun when I bake. He made a meme that said, "I'm the comfy" then I'm going to write comfy in every bread title when I bake. He flipped the horizontal in his meme, I'm going to flip the horizontal in my meme. He posted an SP meme, I'm going to post them 10x as much."
The fact that you have to IP hop lets me know the level of your seethe. You've failed to provoke a "seething choleric temper" in your target like you announced you intended, you failed to destroy your target like you announced you intended, you claimed having an avatar is a crime against anonymity but it's all you live for isn't it?
Yeah, I'm the insane one that copies everything that one person does here, the memes he posts, the things he says, how he memes, the mannerisms he uses, and then claims they're the person they copy like some insane tranny-like ideology where you act like you just have to say you're something and everyone is supposed to go along with it and indulge your delusion. At least you were honest with your projection in that post. I'd recommend you take your meds but the best course of action would be that you never have internet access again to try and corrupt people with your evil bullshit.
One year shy of the Dodge Viper. Always liked the look of those but I hear the ass-end was heavy.
It would have broke their Den of Absolute Retards Discord channel if I would've traded a dick pic to prove that I hate who they hate to let me join their little exclusive club of anonymous image board forum manipulators and consensus crackers. Tranimae really would have been jealous then.