>>2372586 lb
I don't have an aim re: Anons.
I'm trying to reach out to Q.
I want Q to communicate in a way that make the average citizen care about the message.
And I don't want to discuss this, because I already made up my mind about this topic.
>>2372586 lb
I don't have an aim re: Anons.
I'm trying to reach out to Q.
I want Q to communicate in a way that make the average citizen care about the message.
And I don't want to discuss this, because I already made up my mind about this topic.
Why are you thinking that I'm not doing that?
+1
>you aren't willing to debate the possibility that you might be wrong.
You CAN debate this, all you want.
This is okay.
But I've made up my mind and I won't change my mind.
And because I'm talking to Q, maybe someone from the team might read it, there is no reason to answer me, if you aren't Q.
Good post.
Read your post and will think about it.
Yes.
>You cannot fool a massive group of dedicated gold star researchers.
To me this sounded corny, like wanting to make up for shouting at Anons the night before.
And I agree with you on the rest, you wrote.
Get your act together!