THIS IS SLAVERY. Alex must work for no pay and can never achieve freedom from the debt. THIS IS HELL. NOT JUSTICE.
The Sandy Hook families don't want money, or they would have taken the bankruptcy reorganization where they would have made money from Alex's continued work. THEY WANT THE DESTRUCTION OF ALEX and HIS VOICE SILENCED.
"Jones previously asked the judge to provide time to reorganize his business as the Sandy Hook families demanded the collection of $1.5 billion they were awarded in their outlandish verdicts against him."
Supreme Court declines to hear Alex Jones’ appeal
Why did Alex Jones say about Sandy Hook?
Oct 13, 2025 (excerpt)
In the aftermath of the Sandy Hook school shooting on Dec. 14, 2012, which left 20 children and six adult staff members dead, Jones repeatedly criticized media coverage of the event and suggested that aspects of the shooting had been staged to promote support for new gun restrictions.
In April 2013, four months after the shooting, he called it a “government operation” with “inside job written all over it,” according to Reuters. In a wide-ranging 2017 interview with Megyn Kelly, Jones said he “tend[s] to believe that children probably did die there. But then you look at all the other evidence on the other side.”
What happened in the Sandy Hook lawsuits against Alex Jones?
Family members of Sandy Hook victims and an FBI agent who worked the scene sued Jones for defamation and emotional distress. They alleged, among other things, that he had fueled harassment against them by misrepresenting what happened during the shooting in his public commentary. Some of the lawsuits were filed in Connecticut, while others were filed in Texas, where Free Speech Systems, the parent company of InfoWars, is based, according to Reuters.
In both Connecticut and Texas, judges entered default judgments against Jones, finding him liable for defamation and emotional distress. Judge Maya Guerra Gamble in Texas cited Jones’ “flagrant bad faith and callous disregard” for the judicial process to explain her decision. A Texas jury later awarded the parents involved in the lawsuit nearly $50 million in damages.
Connecticut Superior Court Judge Barbara Bellis pointed to Jones’ “willful noncompliance” during the discovery process to justify her decision. She then convened a jury, which decided that Jones should pay nearly $1 billion in compensatory damages. Bellis later added more than $400 million in punitive damages to the judgment.
Did Alex Jones pay the families?
After the default judgments were announced, Jones and Free Speech Systems filed for bankruptcy protection. The Sandy Hook families became part of those proceedings, first to try to prevent the bankruptcy proceedings from stalling their preexisting cases and then to take part in negotiations over how Jones would pay them what he owed them.
In June 2024, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Christopher Lopez ordered the liquidation of Jones’ personal assets, including his stake in InfoWars, according to Reuters. That decision led to a high-profile auction of InfoWars and a dispute between the bidders.
The Onion, a popular satirical news site that had the support of several Sandy Hook families, initially was declared the winner of the auction over First United American Companies, which, according to NBC News, is “a limited liability company that runs Jones’ online supplements store.” But Jones and FUAC sued to block The Onion’s purchase of InfoWars, contending that the auction wasn’t fair. After assessing their arguments, Lopez rejected the sale, explaining that the auction was flawed and that organizers should have worked to get a higher offer. Lopez’s decision made it possible for Jones to stay at InfoWars, at least for now.
Why is Alex Jones appealing to the Supreme Court?
Jones’ Sept. 5 appeal to the Supreme Court centered on the Connecticut judgment. He contended that the default judgment was improper because it presented an incomplete picture of his statements about Sandy Hook, it made too much of “trivial” discovery issues, and it undermined Supreme Court precedent on the First Amendment rights of media defendants, like him.
“Viewed in full context, Jones expressly affirmed that deaths occurred, while using the phrases ‘staged’ or ‘hoax’ to characterize media and governmental scripting. It is therefore contextually impossible to construe his remarks as denying deaths, as the Complaint did by selective editing. Precisely to guard against such distortions, this Court has required independent judicial review of the entire record in First Amendment cases,” the petition for review said.
https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/10/alex-jones-goes-to-the-supreme-court/