Domestic Enemies to the Constitution of the United States unlawfully detain and demand ID from man 100% lawfully and constitutionally recording in public, claiming it's "suspicious" even though there is absolutely no Reasonable Articulable Suspicion of a Crime.
Deprivation of rights under color of law is a CRIME. Police COWARDICE does not trump the rights of the people, the constitution, of ACTUAL law. These cops violated 18 USC 242 and belong in prison.
Domestic Enemy to the Constitution of the United States unlawfully demands ID from street preacher, when asked what law he's breaking, the cop cites obstruction for refusing to ID. It can't be, because he had no RAS to demand ID.
Deprivation of rights under color of law is a CRIME.
Was naming my state supposed to scare me or something? I've named it myself several times. I don't hide.
Notice projection is all you've got.
>DIRTY COP
Can't run for VP if you're not eligible to be president.
Careful who you follow.
You mean as soon as government "asset" agitators get it declared unlawful assembly.
You realize this isn't about RvsD as Q said and the right has been violating the US constitution and rights of the people since before Obama came into office.
You're lost in the plot of the show. The Truth is in the middle.
Actually law enforcement were saying that LONG before the left… while holding themselves above the law.
Domestic Enemies to the Constitution of the United States unlawfully detain and disarm man for 100% lawfully and constitutionally open carrying walking down a sidewalk.
They are are Domestic Enemies to the Constitution of the United States and a threat to the lives and freedom of every American.
I'm not a democrat dipshit. This isn't about RvsD, why is that so hard for you to grasp? The "sides" are working TOGETHER in this op.
Was it democrats who instated the unconstitutional so called "patriot act"?
I do not throw stones, I tell the Truth.
Domestic Enemy to the Constitution of the United States makes up law that doesn't exist and claims 100% lawfully and constitutionally recording in public "can be considered intrusive and disorderly conduct"
The retard also asks for insurance even though it's not a traffic stop.
"Gerald Shields saw an unusually large number of cop cars at a traffic stop. He began filming them from across the public street. No yelling, no interference, no threats. Just recording what police officers were doing - in public, from a safe distance. But minutes later, Gerald was face-down on the ground, injured, and under arrest. The alleged crime? Improperly crossing the street. But as it turns out, that wasn’t actually a crime. The officers were just harassing Gerald because he was filming them. They didn’t even deny it…"
Deprivation of rights under color of law IS A CRIME. Conspiracy against rights IS A CRIME.
Ah the old "enticing Israel to sin". Thing is, exercising our rights is not "enticing" them to sin.