>>23790089 lb
>https://x.com/FirstLadyOffice/status/1983949380362367151
on the clock Q2436 - Lexington and Concord
11/06 = 9/11
I was serching for RIG FOR RED, But your version worked too.
House lawmakers told their paychecks are delayed until government reopens
House lawmakers have been told their paychecks will be delayed until Congress passes a new funding bill. CBS News congressional reporter Taurean Small has the latest on the government shutdown.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/house-lawmakers-told-their-paychecks-are-delayed-until-government-reopens/vi-AA1Pw3sc?ocid=msedgntp&pc=LCTS&cvid=6903cb51cba04e7ea8f1570df5740f0a&ei=31
FBI makes several arrests among Mississippi law enforcement agencies, sheriff says
JACKSON, Miss. (AP) — AMississippideputy sheriff was arrested Thursday by the FBI, one of several arrests it made across multiple law enforcement agencies in the state, a local sheriff said.
SunflowerCounty Sheriff James Haywood confirmed the arrest of his deputy, MarvinFlowers.He also said the FBI arrested the sheriffs of two other counties, in addition to other law enforcement officers, on allegations of public corruption. Haywood did not provide further details about the allegations.
Seems like comms
Judge indicates she’ll intervene in fight over SNAP food assistance money
A federal judge in Boston indicated Thursday that she will intervene in a high-stakes fight over the Trump administration’s decision to not tap into billions of dollars in emergency funds to help cover food stamp benefits for tens of millions of Americans in November.
“Right now, Congress has put money in an emergency fund for an emergency, and it’s hard for me to understand how this isn’t an emergency when there’s no money and a lot of people are needing their SNAP benefits,” US District Judge Indira Talwani said near the end of a hearing, referring to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, the formal name for food stamps.
Though the judge’s options vary, one possibility is that she issues an emergency order that essentially compels the administration to tap into the emergency funds. While she indicated from the bench that she was likely to issue a ruling favorable to a group of Democratic attorneys general and governors who sued the administration earlier this week, she acknowledged that benefits, which should start being sent to recipients on November 1, will be delayed.
“We’re dealing with the reality that … the benefits aren’t going to be there on November 1,” she said.
Talwani said she would work quickly to issue her decision later Thursday.
Nearly 42 million Americans receive food stamps, a critical piece of the nation’s safety net. The program costs roughly $8.5 billion to $9 billion a month, while the contingency fund now has about $5.3 billion in it, according to court filings submitted by the Justice Department, which is representing USDA in the case.
Elite Fully Loaded Golf Carts - LSVs & Street Legal Golf Carts - Lifted LSV Golf Carts
Sponsored
bintelli.com
Elite Fully Loaded Golf Carts - LSVs & Street Legal Golf Carts - Lifted LSV Golf Carts
Learn More
call to action icon
more
If the judge orders the government to use the emergency funds, it will take time for the US Department of Agriculture and states to get their systems up and running again, which means at least some beneficiaries will likely have to wait for the November allotment.
It’s also unclear whether recipients will receive their full November benefits since the USDA’s contingency fund does not have enough money to cover the entire payments without drawing from other resources. But the Trump administration has shifted money to fund other priorities during the shutdown, including transferring $300 million to keep the WIC food assistance program for pregnant women, new moms and young children afloat for October.
Much of the discussion during Thursday’s hearing centered around the fact that the contingency fund contains far less than what is needed to fully cover November benefits for the millions of Americans who receive them. The judge said multiple times that federal law made clear that when the government is unable to pay benefits, it should reduce what it provides, not suspend the program altogether.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/judge-indicates-she-ll-intervene-in-fight-over-snap-food-assistance-money/ar-AA1Pwb7y?ocid=msedgntp&pc=LCTS&cvid=6903cb51cba04e7ea8f1570df5740f0a&ei=67
Melania Trump's Lazy White House Halloween Decorations Confirm What We Already Knew
Historically, U.S. first ladies have taken on the task of decorating the White House for the holidays. Melania Trump, however, doesn't seem to enjoy taking on any tasks typically associated with first ladies. And she definitely isn't interested in tasks having anything to do with Christmas. We all remember that bizarre Melania Christmas tape in which she was secretly recorded revealing her Grinch status. "Who gives a f*** about Christmas stuff and decorations?" she asked, per X. But maybe Halloween decorating is different. After all, she's been married to Donald Trump for 20 years, so she must be an expert on nightmare fuel, right? Well, apparently, Melania did, in fact, decorate the White House for Halloween — and she put in about as much effort as you might expect.
"The [White House] is getting ready for Halloween," the official Office of the First Lady X account wrote in an October 28 tweet. The caption accompanied a photo of the White House in which the stairs are lined with pumpkins, and there are paper leaves hung around the columns. In the center, letters that read "Halloween 2025" are hung. Assuming that Melania detests Halloween decorations half as much as Christmas decorations, perhaps we should consider it a win that the White House is decorated at all. Still, it's definitely lackluster compared to years past.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/melania-trump-s-lazy-white-house-halloween-decorations-confirm-what-we-already-knew/ar-AA1PwHLi?ocid=msedgntp&pc=LCTS&cvid=6903dbd907a44222ba66cedad36002d6&ei=11
'There is simply no connection': Trump admin wins rare district court victory in immigration case about attorney access to detainees
The Trump administration has secured a somewhat rare victory at the district court level in an immigration case out of Oregon.
On Thursday, two immigrant advocacy groups were denied a requested temporary restraining order (TRO) that would have guaranteed attorney access to detainees brought up on deportation-related charges in, but then removed from, the Beaver State.
In a six-page opinion and order, U.S. District Judge Ann Aiken, a Bill Clinton appointee, said the plaintiffs did not yet make a clear enough showing that such alleged behavior by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents is unconstitutional.
"Plaintiffs allege that ICE obstructs and delays attorneys from meeting with their detained clients before it transfers their clients out of state," the judge explains. "Plaintiffs' Motion for TRO is DENIED."
Love true crime? Sign up for our newsletter, The Law&Crime Docket, to get the latest real-life crime stories delivered right to your inbox.
The litigation was filed earlier this month by the Innovation Law Lab, a Portland-based group of lawyers, activists, and tech professionals focused on immigration reform and upholding constitutional rights.
In a 35-page complaint and concomitant 21-page motion for a TRO, the plaintiffs allege various violations of the First Amendment, Fifth Amendment, and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), the federal statute governing the behavior of administrative agencies like ICE.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/there-is-simply-no-connection-trump-admin-wins-rare-district-court-victory-in-immigration-case-about-attorney-access-to-detainees/ar-AA1PwheG?ocid=msedgntp&pc=LCTS&cvid=6903dbd907a44222ba66cedad36002d6&ei=28
Thriller - Michael Jackson playing
Make it rain.