Anonymous ID: bff479 Nov. 3, 2025, 2:36 p.m. No.23807485   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>23807474

> Parakeet.

Wrong. You make this mistake every time, Moshe. I'm "Trademark Anon" as you used to call me.

>You really need to look up the definition of ad hominem if you want to use it in a sentence properly.

 

Kek. I'm not the faggot that doesn't know the definition. I asked a simple question that you couldn't answer and rather than admit it, you attempted to attack me by 1. calling me a "liar" and 2. attempting to deflect again, by labeling me as someone that is clearly your arch-nemesis and someone that can seriously get your panties in a bunch. I'm going to help you out, though, since I hate arguing with reee-tards.

 

Ad hominem (Latin for 'to the person'), short for argumentum ad hominem, refers to several types of arguments where the speaker attacks the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than the substance of the argument itself.

Anonymous ID: bff479 Nov. 3, 2025, 3:28 p.m. No.23807632   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>23807538

>I'm not interested in the same fucking slide that's been going on for 24 years.

If it's been going on for 24 years, is it really a "fucking slide?" If so, when do we get to talk about the wooden doors on the showers or the roller coaster ovens, or the masturbation death machines, or the electrified floors, etc?