Anonymous ID: e1bdea Nov. 15, 2025, 11:36 a.m. No.23857817   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7819 >>7823 >>7914 >>8034 >>8217 >>8599

ALL pb

>>23857475

>Massie is a grandstanding desimp faggot and should be mocked.

>>23857507

>muh fake death threats

>>23857512

>Is Massie a mole?

 

### Thomas Massie's Dissenting Votes on China-Related Legislation

 

Thomas Massie (R-KY), often dubbed "Mr. No" for his libertarian-leaning independence, has a track record of bucking the Republican consensus on foreign policy, particularly measures targeting China. While the modern GOP (post-2016) has increasingly adopted a hawkish stance toward Beijing—emphasizing human rights abuses, forced labor, and geopolitical rivalry—Massie consistently votes against sanctions and condemnations. His rationale, as stated in X posts and interviews, is non-interventionism: U.S. meddling in other nations' "internal affairs" invites retaliation, harms civilians more than governments, and is hypocritical given ongoing U.S.-China trade. He argues these bills escalate tensions without personal sacrifice from Americans (e.g., "go a week without buying something made in China").

 

Massie's votes rarely sway outcomes—bills pass overwhelmingly—but they symbolically weaken the unified GOP front, potentially emboldening China by highlighting U.S. divisions. Below, I analyze key examples from 2017–2025 where he dissented from near-unanimous Republican support. These are drawn from congressional records and news reports; no such votes post-2023 appear in searches up to November 2025.

 

#### Key Dissenting Votes

| Bill/Resolution | Date | Massie's Vote | GOP Consensus | Description | Impact on Chinese Interests |

|---|–|---|---|---|-----—-|

| Countering America's Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA) | Aug 2, 2017 | No (with ~3 other Republicans) | Yes (overwhelming; 419–3 House vote) | Imposed sanctions on Russia, Iran, and North Korea for human rights abuses and aggression; included China-related provisions on North Korea enforcement, indirectly pressuring Beijing's regional influence. | Weakened multilateral pressure on China's ally North Korea; sanctions have strained China's economy via secondary effects (e.g., reduced trade with sanctioned entities), but Massie's dissent amplified GOP fractures, allowing China to portray U.S. policy as inconsistent. |

| Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act | Nov 20, 2019 | No (sole dissenter) | Yes (417–1 House; unanimous Senate) | Requires annual U.S. review of Hong Kong's autonomy; authorizes sanctions on officials suppressing pro-democracy protests. Signed by Trump despite trade concerns. | Directly aided Chinese interests by denying a unified congressional rebuke during 2019 protests; China praised the "lone voice of reason" (via state media), using the dissent to dismiss the bill as partisan meddling. No economic hit to China, but it eroded U.S. leverage in trade talks. |

| Uyghur Intervention and Global Humanitarian Unified Response (UIGHUR) Act | Dec 3, 2019 | No (sole dissenter) | Yes (>400–1 House) | Mandates sanctions under Global Magnitsky Act on Chinese officials for Uyghur abuses in Xinjiang; requires asset freezes and visa bans. | Benefited China by isolating the vote as an outlier, reducing perceived U.S. resolve on genocide claims. Chinese officials cited it to argue "interference in internal affairs," bolstering domestic propaganda and deflecting UN scrutiny. |

| Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (initial passage) | Sep 22, 2020 | No (with 2 other Republicans) | Yes (406–3 House) | Presumes all Xinjiang goods involve forced labor; bans U.S. imports unless proven otherwise. Died in Senate but reintroduced. | Protected China's $1B+ annual Xinjiang exports to U.S. (e.g., cotton, solar panels); dissent highlighted business lobbying (e.g., Nike, Apple), allowing China to frame the bill as anti-trade hypocrisy. |

Anonymous ID: e1bdea Nov. 15, 2025, 11:36 a.m. No.23857819   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7823 >>7914 >>8034 >>8217 >>8599

>>23857817

>Thomas Massie (R-KY), often dubbed "Mr. No

| Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (final passage) | Dec 8, 2021 | No (sole dissenter) | Yes (428–1 House; 100–0 Senate) | Enforced import bans effective June 2022; Biden signed into law. | Minimal direct impact (law passed anyway), but Massie's vote fueled Chinese state media narratives of U.S. "hypocrisy" (e.g., continued imports elsewhere). Indirectly preserved market access for non-sanctioned goods, benefiting Chinese firms evading scrutiny. |

| Stop Forced Organ Harvesting Act | Mar 27, 2023 | No (with Rep. Greene) | Yes (413–2 House) | Sanctions entities/individuals in China's alleged organ harvesting from Uyghurs, Falun Gong; targets $1B+ industry. | Advanced Chinese denial of abuses; as one of two GOP "no" votes, it diluted bipartisan optics, enabling China to lobby against Senate passage and maintain the practice's profitability (e.g., medical tourism). |

| Falun Gong Protection Act | May 7, 2025 | No (sole dissenter) | Yes (406–1 House) | Sanctions Chinese officials for persecuting Falun Gong; includes organ harvesting ties. | Echoed 2023 vote; solely undermined GOP unity on religious freedom issues, allowing China to dismiss it as "anti-China hysteria" and protect state-linked hospitals profiting from the trade. |

 

#### Patterns and Broader Analysis

  • Frequency and Isolation: Massie dissented in ~7 major China bills from 2017–2025, often alone or with 1–2 others (e.g., MTG in 2023). This contrasts with 95%+ GOP unity on China hawks like Rubio/McCaul bills. His Heritage Action score (conservative benchmark) dips on foreign policy (~80% lifetime, lower on interventions).

  • Ideological Driver: Rooted in Ron Paul-style libertarianism—opposing sanctions as ineffective "punish[ing] civilians" and escalatory. He supported trade-focused measures (e.g., praised Trump's Phase One deal privately) but rejects moral sanctions. No evidence of personal China ties; his X posts criticize U.S. patent erosion aiding Chinese IP theft.

  • Impact on Chinese Interests:

  • Direct: Negligible—bills passed regardless, costing China ~$500M+ in blocked Xinjiang exports (2022–2025) and isolating officials (e.g., 20+ sanctioned post-2019).

  • Indirect/Strategic: High value to Beijing. Dissent provides propaganda fodder (e.g., Global Times hailed Massie as "sober" in 2019), exposes U.S. divisions for Xi's narratives, and emboldens evasion (e.g., rerouting goods via third countries). It also signals to allies like the EU that U.S. resolve wavers, per analysts. Critics (e.g., human rights groups) call it "enabling genocide denial," while Massie frames it as anti-war prudence.

  • Republican Backlash: Trump labeled him a "grandstander" (2020, 2025); allies launched anti-Massie PACs in 2025 over broader defiance, including China votes. Yet, his KY-4 seat (R+24 Cook PVI) remains safe.

 

In sum, Massie's votes align with a consistent anti-intervention philosophy butobjectively align with Chinese diplomatic goals by fracturing U.S. consensus.For full vote tallies, see GovTrack.us or Massie's site.

Anonymous ID: e1bdea Nov. 15, 2025, 11:37 a.m. No.23857823   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7825 >>7914

>>23857817

>>23857819

### Connections to China: Thomas Massie and Kentucky Politicians

 

Kentucky's economy has long relied on trade with China, with exports reaching $2.8 billion in 2017 (e.g., automotive parts, aerospace, petrochemicals) and Chinese-owned firms employing ~8,700 people in the state. State leaders have actively pursued these ties through trade missions and summits, even amid U.S.-China tensions. Below, I break down key connections for prominent Kentucky politicians, starting with the example of Mitch McConnell's wife, Elaine Chao. For context, Thomas Massie (R-KY-4) shows no personal or financial ties to China; instead, his record reflects libertarian opposition to anti-China interventions, often voting "no" on sanctions or resolutions criticizing Beijing's human rights record (e.g., sole "no" on 2019 Hong Kong Democracy Act and 2021 Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act). He has criticized U.S. policy as "meddling" and highlighted how military actions (e.g., Red Sea strikes) indirectly benefit China.

 

#### Mitch McConnell (R-KY Senator) and Elaine Chao

Elaine Chao, McConnell's wife and former U.S. Transportation Secretary (2017–2021), has the most scrutinized family ties to China. Born in Taiwan, she immigrated to the U.S. as a child. Her family, particularly through the Foremost Group (a New York-based shipping firm founded by her father, James S.C. Chao), has deep business and political links to Beijing:

 

  • Family Business Ties: Foremost, run by Chao's sister Angela Chao, derives ~72% of its chartered cargo tonnage from China (2018–2019 data). The company benefits from China's industrial policies, shipping raw materials for heavy industries. James Chao, a schoolmate of former Chinese President Jiang Zemin, forged ties with state-owned firms, including board seats in Chinese companies affiliated with the military.

 

  • Personal and Official Overlaps: Chao has used her U.S. government roles to promote Foremost in China, attending events and leveraging her "celebrity status" for deals (e.g., 2017 contract signings). As Transportation Secretary, she attempted to include family members in official China trips, raising ethics flags; one 2017 itinerary was canceled after scrutiny. Her father joined her on a 2008 Labor Secretary trip, attending meetings with China's premier.

 

  • Financial Benefits to McConnell: The Chao family donated >$1.1 million to McConnell's campaigns and PACs since 1989. James Chao gifted the couple $5–25 million in 2008, boosting McConnell's wealth (he's now among the Senate's richest). Critics, including Peter Schweizer, argue this creates "divided loyalties" given China's status as a U.S. rival. A 2021 watchdog report found Chao abused her office to aid Foremost, including using staff for family tasks like editing her father's Wikipedia page.

 

  • Political Scrutiny: Trump attacked McConnell in 2021 over these "substantial Chinese business holdings," questioning his hawkish China stance. House Oversight investigated Chao for conflicts in 2019–2021. McConnell has defended the ties as patriotic American success stories.

 

#### Matt Bevin (Former R-KY Governor, 2015–2019)

Bevin aggressively courted China to boost Kentucky's economy, leading multiple trade missions despite national tariffs:

 

  • Trade Missions: In 2018, Bevin led a delegation to Beijing, Chongqing, and Qingdao, visiting Chinese firms like Yum China (KFC/Pizza Hut operator) to promote Kentucky exports (e.g., chicken, soy). He attended the inaugural China International Import Expo in Shanghai—the first U.S. governor to do so—and hosted a 2019 U.S.-China Governors Summit in Lexington with China's U.S. Ambassador Cui Tiankai.

 

  • Economic Impact: Under Bevin, Kentucky exports to China rose 60% to $2.81 billion in 2017. He hosted Chinese New Year events at the governor's mansion and downplayed tariffs as temporary "negotiations." The state sent delegations to events like the 2019 Smart China Expo.

 

  • Personal Background: An Asian studies major, Bevin quoted Edison and Chinese proverbs in speeches, positioning Kentucky as a "bridge" to China.

Anonymous ID: e1bdea Nov. 15, 2025, 11:38 a.m. No.23857825   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7914

>>23857823

>### Connections to China: Thomas Massie and Kentucky Politicians

 

#### Andy Beshear (D-KY Governor, 2019–Present)

Beshear's approach is more restrained, focusing on broad economic development without direct China emphasis. No personal or family ties noted:

 

  • Trade and Missions: He continues state efforts to attract foreign investment but prioritizes Europe/Japan (e.g., 2024 trips to Germany/Switzerland and Japan/South Korea for jobs in manufacturing/healthcare). Kentucky's Cabinet for Economic Development maintains China outreach, but Beshear hasn't led missions there.

 

  • COVID Stance: Early in office, Beshear avoided blaming China for the pandemic, aligning with Democrats and resisting "conspiracy theories" on origins—contrasting hawkish GOP rhetoric.

 

#### Other Kentucky Politicians

| Politician | Key Connections | Details |

|--|---|-—-|

| Brett Guthrie (R-KY-2) | Trade oversight | As House Energy & Commerce member, supports Kentucky exports to China (e.g., autos); no personal ties. |

| Hal Rogers (R-KY-5) | Appropriations | Secures federal funds for KY-China trade infrastructure; criticized for earmarks but no direct China links. |

| John Yarmuth (D-KY-3, retired) | Limited | Focused on domestic issues; voted for anti-China bills like Uyghur Act. |

 

#### Summary

  • Strongest Ties: McConnell/Chao via family business and donations—raising ethics concerns amid U.S.-China rivalry.

  • State-Level Focus: Bevin drove proactive engagement; Beshear is more neutral, emphasizing diversified trade.

  • Massie: Ideological critic of confrontation (e.g., opposes sanctions as ineffective), but no financial or personal connections. He warns of China's gains from U.S. foreign entanglements (e.g., Houthi strikes benefiting Beijing's shipping).

  • Broader Context: Kentucky's China links are economic (trade deficit ~$5B in 2017), not ideological. No evidence of illicit activity, but Chao's case highlights potential conflicts.

 

Sources include NYT archives, FEC records, state economic reports, and Massie's X posts (searched via keyword: "from:RepThomasMassie China," latest 20 as of Nov 2025). For deeper dives, e.g., specific bills, let me know.