ALL pb
>Massie is a grandstanding desimp faggot and should be mocked.
>muh fake death threats
>Is Massie a mole?
### Thomas Massie's Dissenting Votes on China-Related Legislation
Thomas Massie (R-KY), often dubbed "Mr. No" for his libertarian-leaning independence, has a track record of bucking the Republican consensus on foreign policy, particularly measures targeting China. While the modern GOP (post-2016) has increasingly adopted a hawkish stance toward Beijing—emphasizing human rights abuses, forced labor, and geopolitical rivalry—Massie consistently votes against sanctions and condemnations. His rationale, as stated in X posts and interviews, is non-interventionism: U.S. meddling in other nations' "internal affairs" invites retaliation, harms civilians more than governments, and is hypocritical given ongoing U.S.-China trade. He argues these bills escalate tensions without personal sacrifice from Americans (e.g., "go a week without buying something made in China").
Massie's votes rarely sway outcomes—bills pass overwhelmingly—but they symbolically weaken the unified GOP front, potentially emboldening China by highlighting U.S. divisions. Below, I analyze key examples from 2017–2025 where he dissented from near-unanimous Republican support. These are drawn from congressional records and news reports; no such votes post-2023 appear in searches up to November 2025.
#### Key Dissenting Votes
| Bill/Resolution | Date | Massie's Vote | GOP Consensus | Description | Impact on Chinese Interests |
|---|–|---|---|---|-----—-|
| Countering America's Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA) | Aug 2, 2017 | No (with ~3 other Republicans) | Yes (overwhelming; 419–3 House vote) | Imposed sanctions on Russia, Iran, and North Korea for human rights abuses and aggression; included China-related provisions on North Korea enforcement, indirectly pressuring Beijing's regional influence. | Weakened multilateral pressure on China's ally North Korea; sanctions have strained China's economy via secondary effects (e.g., reduced trade with sanctioned entities), but Massie's dissent amplified GOP fractures, allowing China to portray U.S. policy as inconsistent. |
| Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act | Nov 20, 2019 | No (sole dissenter) | Yes (417–1 House; unanimous Senate) | Requires annual U.S. review of Hong Kong's autonomy; authorizes sanctions on officials suppressing pro-democracy protests. Signed by Trump despite trade concerns. | Directly aided Chinese interests by denying a unified congressional rebuke during 2019 protests; China praised the "lone voice of reason" (via state media), using the dissent to dismiss the bill as partisan meddling. No economic hit to China, but it eroded U.S. leverage in trade talks. |
| Uyghur Intervention and Global Humanitarian Unified Response (UIGHUR) Act | Dec 3, 2019 | No (sole dissenter) | Yes (>400–1 House) | Mandates sanctions under Global Magnitsky Act on Chinese officials for Uyghur abuses in Xinjiang; requires asset freezes and visa bans. | Benefited China by isolating the vote as an outlier, reducing perceived U.S. resolve on genocide claims. Chinese officials cited it to argue "interference in internal affairs," bolstering domestic propaganda and deflecting UN scrutiny. |
| Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (initial passage) | Sep 22, 2020 | No (with 2 other Republicans) | Yes (406–3 House) | Presumes all Xinjiang goods involve forced labor; bans U.S. imports unless proven otherwise. Died in Senate but reintroduced. | Protected China's $1B+ annual Xinjiang exports to U.S. (e.g., cotton, solar panels); dissent highlighted business lobbying (e.g., Nike, Apple), allowing China to frame the bill as anti-trade hypocrisy. |